BREAKING CLOSE 2

Why does history seem to be repeating itself and the situation in Kursk resemble the Nazi withdrawal from the Taman peninsula in 1943?

 

By Sidney Hey

Sometimes history repeats itself, not in the same way but with striking similarities. What has been going on in Kursk for a week now is very similar to the forced withdrawal of Third Reich forces from the Kuban River bridge on the Taman peninsula of the Krasnodar region of the Krasnodar region in south-west Russia since the end of 1943.

Although the current frontline is centred on Ukrainian territory and a portion of Russian territory, geographically it is the same area. If Sam Peckinpah were alive, he would undoubtedly be outlining a new film in the style of 1977's Cross of Iron. Today its sequel would take place in Kursk and those fleeing leaving a trail of casualties and destroyed vehicles are the neo-Nazis supported by the EU but especially by the British, French and Americans.

A week ago Russian Federation troops began an offensive from different points that has forced a massive withdrawal of Ukrainians and their Atlanticist supporters under threat of being trapped in cauldrons where they would be pulverised by artillery. After the recapture and liberation of the town of Sudzha (through an astonishing pipe line tactical operation), the situation of the UAF is certainly desperate and the losses that already exceed 20,000 men, there is a great cost in material that has been destroyed even by one of the main roads where they are retreating despite the refusals of Führer Zelensky.

The start of the liberation offensive was witnessed by Russian President Vladimir Putin himself, who was present at the military operation command on 13 March to give instructions to the commanders as to what the objectives are and to see first hand how the operations are being set in motion.

Confidential sources have reported that Putin, dressed in combat fatigues, well escorted and aboard an armoured vehicle, approached, but very discreetly, one of the points from which the invaders are being pushed. This surprise visit boosted the morale and morale of the units, which, by spreading the word to all divisions involved in the operations, are determined to carry out the eviction of the neo-Nazis and their Atlanticist colleagues as quickly as possible.

According to the perspectives gathered on the ground, the speed with which operations to recapture and consolidate villages are progressing goes hand in hand with the increase in casualties and desertions among the ranks of the UAF. It was against this backdrop that President Putin himself went on national television in a meeting with the General Staff to announce his government's commitment to the early liberation of Kursk territory.

It seems that the Russian forces launched an offensive from various directions under cover of overwhelming shell fire from their artillery units, GRAD units and aviation using the powerful FAB-3000 and FAB-5000 bombs, which have knocked out entire tank regiments.

A large part of the material losses that are being scattered on the ground are mostly of Western origin. NATO trucks, armoured vehicles and battle tanks of all shapes and sizes now lie rotting in the open and on the sides of the main roads connecting to Sumy after being destroyed by Russian forces. One of the main roads where the UAF's logistics moved has been virtually cut off and it is there that all kinds of burnt and destroyed vehicles can be seen along the route after being hit by Russian drones or bombs.

In Brussels there is no comment on this and obviously the media that answer to their line will not expose what can already be said to be a resounding failure. The outcome of the operations will resemble the receding waters after a flood. The consequences and achievements of the liberation operation will only become apparent after the eviction of the invaders.

The situation is untenable and there is not a single NATO commander (including the British and French) with two fingers on the pulse who would risk saying that it is possible to halt the advance of Russian troops and at the same time fight back.

The information that is filtering through speaks of a full withdrawal, although on some fronts in the encirclement around Kursk several Ukrainian battle groups have been surrounded and trapped with no choice but to fight to the death or surrender. One consideration the invaders must already be assessing is their status if captured, as Vladimir Putin has signed an executive order deeming the prisoners to be ‘terrorists’.

There is no doubt that the Russian offensive is in line with the agreement reached with Washington DC to establish a 30-day pause, although it should be noted that this does not convince the Russian government, let alone Vladimir Putin. Moscow will undoubtedly not enter into any agreement that would make Kursk a bargaining chip for anything, so if the Russian military can dislodge the Ukrainians and their Atlanticist allies before any papers are signed, it will be a double victory for Russia.

Equally, as we have already seen, the Russians must not let their guard down, as the neo-Nazi junta of Fuhrer Zelensky will do everything in its power to try to create discord among the negotiators, and in that plan the British and French governments are doing everything they can to help.

 

 

SEÑALES DE MULTILATERALIDAD O ¿UNA FARSA?

¿Qué puede entenderse del espectáculo dado en el Salón Oval entre un cómico-trágico y un empresario psicótico?

 

Por Charles H. Slim

De la escandalosa y hasta cómica reunión del 28 de febrero pasado entre Zelensky, Donald Trump y el vice J.D. Vance en el Salón Oval que fue vista por millones de ojos alrededor del mundo, se pueden sacar varias conclusiones, pero hay una que especialmente importante para quienes bregamos por un mundo multipolar y equilibrado, y es precisamente que solo la vía del respeto y la buena fe entre las naciones puede traer la paz. Pese a ello, debemos pisar con cuidado ya que no todo lo que se ve puede ser real.

La impostura que vimos de un acalorado Zelensky y un Trump enojado por dicho exabrupto podría ser un paso de comedia que buscaría despistar a la Federación de Rusia aún a riesgo del ridículo público más absoluto. Pero si ya conocemos los antecedentes de Washington, pocas chances hay de darle credibilidad.

Las medidas y comentarios posteriores a este pésimo sketch ya darían por confirmado esto: Todo fue una actuación. Aunque se dijo que Trump echó al enano fascista de La Casa Blanca sin tratar ni formar sobre el asunto de las tierras raras, todo ya estaría más que charlado ¿Y qué significaría eso? ¿Acaso que las armas estadounidenses seguirían llegando a Kiev? Este supuesto corte en la provisión de armamento no significa que Washington lo siga haciendo por medio de terceros países. Solo para tener en cuenta, en Europa hay bases estadounidenses con acopio de armas y municiones que muy bien pueden seguir siendo transportados con vehículos y aviones de estados europeos.   

Por otra parte, la supuesta negativa de Trump de continuar abasteciendo a Kiev tiene un alto grado de verosimilitud y prueba de ello son las continuas derrotas y rendiciones que son indiscutibles en todo el frente y particularmente en Kursk donde las fuerzas atlantistas ya han comenzado su disimulada retirada.

Pero hay otras conexiones que supuestamente se vieron interrumpidas tras esta actuación y una de ellas es la ayuda en inteligencia en todas las esferas del área.

No podemos olvidar que Trump fue quien en su primera presidencia imprimió las sanciones comerciales más severas contra Rusia, sino que también armo con los sistemas de misiles anti tanque FGM-148 “Javelin” al ejército ucraniano causando costosas pérdidas en material y vidas humanas. Estos precedentes les restan credibilidad a los auspicios de una paz promovida por el empresario blondo y que para peor, tras haber alimentado a un régimen neonazi, ha dejado expuesto ante los ojos del público a un enano caprichoso y prepotente Zelensky al cual ante las cámaras no pudo controlar.

Pero si nos creemos el intento aparentemente sincero de Trump de buscar la paz y terminar con la guerra en Ucrania, ello debería causar un fuerte choque con sus aliados europeos o al menos, discusiones. Hasta el momento por lo que estamos viendo en el espectro europeo los viejos colonialistas del continente (Gran Bretaña y Francia a la cabeza) se sacuden como si les dieran un electro shock. Londres sin dudas es el centro político desde donde se irradia la rusofobia global y al parecer Starmer esta decidido a tomar la cabeza en continuar la guerra. Zelensky ve en ellos el último refugio ante el abandono de EEUU y sin dudas que Londres y otros secuaces que le siguen le están proporcionando toda la cobertura que necesite para seguir picando al Oso ruso.

Seguramente los estrategas británicos conscientes de que no pueden dar la cobertura que daban los estadounidenses ni mucho menos intervenir directamente, deben estar elaborando planes para que la ayuda no se corte y sostener al régimen neonazi.

Starmer y Lammy deben tener en maratónicas reuniones al Estado mayor y a los chicos del MI6 trabajando día y noche para que todos ellos generen una estrategia conjunta que pueda suplir a los estadounidenses. Obviamente no podrán reemplazar la infraestructura de los estadounidenses, pero si pueden centrarse en poner en marcha una estrategia especifica en la cual son muy buenos. Como parte de esta estrategia (y en la cual son muy hábiles) está en seguir creando la división interétnica-religiosa que por motivos regionales existe entre el oeste y el este de Ucrania fomentando el odio mutuo.

Una de las tácticas que se están implementando es la del terrorismo. Así asesinar ucranianos ruso parlantes, atacar y destruir iglesias ortodoxas son una parte de la política de desrusificación decretada por Kiev. Los principales activos involucrados sin dudas son la inteligencia militar y los chicos del MI6, profesionales indiscutidos en crear odio y desconfianza entre comunidades ¿Antecedentes de trabajo de estos profesionales? Iraq, Libia son sin dudas las experiencias más notables y hoy muy activos en Siria apoyando por un lado a la resistencia alawita siria y al mismo tiempo dándole una palmada a los terroristas del Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), (remanentes de Al Qaeda, Al Nusra y del ISIS) que para occidente son “rebeldes”.

Con estos precedentes y con todo lo que se mueve por debajo del poder formal estadounidense (Deep State), nadie debería tragarse esta actuación entre dos chiflados como Zelensky y Trump con lo cual, si así se puede intuir desde occidente no hay que ser muy suspicaz para ver lo que el presidente ruso Vladimir Putin y su plana mayor consideran este evento.

 

 

 

BLOW TO THE EUROPEAN LEGION

Why Sir Starmer and Macron's idea of playing superpower is stupidity with serious consequences?

 

By Sir Charlattam

If anything was needed to demonstrate the resounding failure of the Atlanticist adventure in Ukraine, it was a clear and forceful political episode to expose it, and that was the scandalous discussion between Volodomyr Zelensky and Donald Trump in the White House Oval Room, no less.

But beyond this diplomatic scandal, there is a reality on the battlefield that cannot be ignored despite the bluster and insults of Kiev's neo-Nazi hierarch. It seems an irony of life, or rather of contemporary history, that an Ashkenazi Jew (like Benjamin Netanyahu and many of his ministers) leads a junta of neo-Nazis who after that meeting has shown that arrogance and verbal incontinence that Hitler suffered from and demonstrated in his speeches.

Even these personal traits of the Ukrainian leader translate and more than translate into his desperate measures to prevent his downfall, such as forcibly recruiting and if necessary kidnapping as many young people as possible to roam the streets of Ukrainian ‘democracy’. Obviously the big Atlanticist pimps in the West and especially those who swarm in the Argentine media (and most particularly in the Autonomous City), this is neither seen nor talked about.

Despite their desire to cover their noses to avoid smelling the stench of such political decomposition, beyond the silence of these media mercenaries, Zelensky and his regime have been exposed to millions of people around the world who no longer doubt the political nature of what he represents.

While villages, towns and cities are falling day by day and his forces are retreating to avoid being pulverised, the ‘Führer’ Zelensky does not accept the facts and like his German counterpart in the supposedly defeated Third Reich, he orders to continue fighting, obviously, ‘to the last drop of blood’ of his unwary citizens, ratifying the twisted commitment of the senile Joe Biden. If he has not been overthrown by his own officers or his own people, it is because his entire personal security apparatus and intelligence dependents are under the direct control of the Americans and the British (CIA, MI5 and MI6) and this has certainly not changed despite alleged cuts in US cooperation.

Apparently, after the alleged fight in the White House, the Americans have apparently cut off the supply of arms and strategic support, but that remains to be seen. There are too many interests in this war to believe that Trump can throw away billions of dollars on such a deal. Those who, taking advantage of these circumstances, have rushed to try to regain their old imperialist and colonialist glories are the British and the French who, despite their mutual skulduggery and animosities, have mobilised the shipment of war material as a sign of unconditional support for the ‘Führer’ in Kiev.

Starmer and Macron must have believed that this was their moment and that is why they dispatched a ship with equipment and weapons which, after being tracked by Russian intelligence, was attacked and sunk by Iskander-M missiles just as it arrived in the port of Odessa, causing consternation and a headache that both will conceal very well. Of course, this was not even a rumour commented on by the BBC or France Press, where any fact that reveals casualties or serious losses involving their governments is treated as ‘Russian propaganda’.

The operation was part of the start of a very ambitious (if also very risky) attempt to give substance to a joint plan (in which Ursula Von Der Leyen and Kallas are fascinated) to replace US military support with an obviously British and French-led ‘European legion’. It would not even be surprising if these embarked weapons bore a logo representative of such a society.

His move was intended to give material support to Kiev and, no doubt, explicit political support at a time when Donald Trump humiliatingly snubbed Kiev's ‘Führer’. This show of solidarity cost him a few million pounds, which British taxpayers will pay for with further tax hikes and energy restrictions.

With this shift and since Donald Trump made it clear that he would end the country's defence spending in Europe, Keir Starmer has been in tune with the announced 2.5% increase in Britain's military budget by 2027 as a way of countering this. But while this represents a heavy strain on its already stretched economy, it does not solve the problems of operational inefficiency, let alone catch up with Russian forces.

Therefore, Starmer's bluster about offering the army and probably the Royal Navy to cover the forces that the Americans have already stopped sending is at the very least wishful thinking and nonsense for Britain's own subjects who are not in the mood to go and fight a war that is not only alien, but could end in nuclear escalation.