BLOW TO THE EUROPEAN LEGION

Why Sir Starmer and Macron's idea of playing superpower is stupidity with serious consequences?

 

By Sir Charlattam

If anything was needed to demonstrate the resounding failure of the Atlanticist adventure in Ukraine, it was a clear and forceful political episode to expose it, and that was the scandalous discussion between Volodomyr Zelensky and Donald Trump in the White House Oval Room, no less.

But beyond this diplomatic scandal, there is a reality on the battlefield that cannot be ignored despite the bluster and insults of Kiev's neo-Nazi hierarch. It seems an irony of life, or rather of contemporary history, that an Ashkenazi Jew (like Benjamin Netanyahu and many of his ministers) leads a junta of neo-Nazis who after that meeting has shown that arrogance and verbal incontinence that Hitler suffered from and demonstrated in his speeches.

Even these personal traits of the Ukrainian leader translate and more than translate into his desperate measures to prevent his downfall, such as forcibly recruiting and if necessary kidnapping as many young people as possible to roam the streets of Ukrainian ‘democracy’. Obviously the big Atlanticist pimps in the West and especially those who swarm in the Argentine media (and most particularly in the Autonomous City), this is neither seen nor talked about.

Despite their desire to cover their noses to avoid smelling the stench of such political decomposition, beyond the silence of these media mercenaries, Zelensky and his regime have been exposed to millions of people around the world who no longer doubt the political nature of what he represents.

While villages, towns and cities are falling day by day and his forces are retreating to avoid being pulverised, the ‘Führer’ Zelensky does not accept the facts and like his German counterpart in the supposedly defeated Third Reich, he orders to continue fighting, obviously, ‘to the last drop of blood’ of his unwary citizens, ratifying the twisted commitment of the senile Joe Biden. If he has not been overthrown by his own officers or his own people, it is because his entire personal security apparatus and intelligence dependents are under the direct control of the Americans and the British (CIA, MI5 and MI6) and this has certainly not changed despite alleged cuts in US cooperation.

Apparently, after the alleged fight in the White House, the Americans have apparently cut off the supply of arms and strategic support, but that remains to be seen. There are too many interests in this war to believe that Trump can throw away billions of dollars on such a deal. Those who, taking advantage of these circumstances, have rushed to try to regain their old imperialist and colonialist glories are the British and the French who, despite their mutual skulduggery and animosities, have mobilised the shipment of war material as a sign of unconditional support for the ‘Führer’ in Kiev.

Starmer and Macron must have believed that this was their moment and that is why they dispatched a ship with equipment and weapons which, after being tracked by Russian intelligence, was attacked and sunk by Iskander-M missiles just as it arrived in the port of Odessa, causing consternation and a headache that both will conceal very well. Of course, this was not even a rumour commented on by the BBC or France Press, where any fact that reveals casualties or serious losses involving their governments is treated as ‘Russian propaganda’.

The operation was part of the start of a very ambitious (if also very risky) attempt to give substance to a joint plan (in which Ursula Von Der Leyen and Kallas are fascinated) to replace US military support with an obviously British and French-led ‘European legion’. It would not even be surprising if these embarked weapons bore a logo representative of such a society.

His move was intended to give material support to Kiev and, no doubt, explicit political support at a time when Donald Trump humiliatingly snubbed Kiev's ‘Führer’. This show of solidarity cost him a few million pounds, which British taxpayers will pay for with further tax hikes and energy restrictions.

With this shift and since Donald Trump made it clear that he would end the country's defence spending in Europe, Keir Starmer has been in tune with the announced 2.5% increase in Britain's military budget by 2027 as a way of countering this. But while this represents a heavy strain on its already stretched economy, it does not solve the problems of operational inefficiency, let alone catch up with Russian forces.

Therefore, Starmer's bluster about offering the army and probably the Royal Navy to cover the forces that the Americans have already stopped sending is at the very least wishful thinking and nonsense for Britain's own subjects who are not in the mood to go and fight a war that is not only alien, but could end in nuclear escalation.