sábado, 24 de mayo de 2025

 

EL DERECHO A MASACRAR

¿Cuáles son las dimensiones del genocidio que sigue cometiendo Israel y cuál podría ser el freno para ello?

 

Por Yossi Tevi

Muchos advierten que desde hace un tiempo vivimos en un mundo del revés, lleno de inconsecuencias y arbitrariedades donde lo impensable se ha vuelto una cosa común. Hoy lo vemos muy gráficamente en la franja de Gaza situación que no empezó el 7 de octubre del 2023 como tratan de instalar los relatores pro-israelies. Estas arbitrariedades y la libertad que vemos en la comisión de ellas es una gran muestra de ese mundo torcido e inhumano en el que nos hallamos.

El escenario urbano de los despojos y escombros de lo que alguna vez fue una bulliciosa ciudad costera supera en horror y violencia a las más apocalípticas películas de ciencia ficción. Un ejemplo de esto lo vemos con la película “Terminator” de 1984 en donde al inicio se ve como una ciudad hecha añicos, es barrida y sus habitantes son impiadosamente exterminados por las máquinas de matar. Lo que se ve en toda la franja de Gaza, Rafah, Khan Yunis y las otras ruinas urbanas de la franja es una recreación brutal y muy real de esta maquinaria exterminadora (muy costosa por cierto) que supera a la ficción y que no duda en pisotear a mujeres, niños e infantes como si fueran basura.

Aquí no hay exageración ni un relato “antisemita” como argumenta el aparato de propaganda sionista. Por el contrario, es el reflejo más vergonzante, claro y detestable de lo que es un exterminio contra toda la población semita palestina y para qué, para que Benjamín Netanyahu y sus sicarios talmúdicos exhiban al territorio de la franja como un trofeo para complacer a sus fanáticos y a la vez, dar la vía libre para los negocios inmobiliarios de sus cómplices en todo el hemisferio.

La Operación Gedeón que se lanzó hace unos días busca directamente eliminar a todos y los que aún queden en pie, huyan por sus vidas tal como se hace como un ganado o con los animales asustados por el fuego. Eso es lo que las FDI con la ayuda (financiera, militar y política) de los EEUU y de grupos de mercenarios privados están haciendo. Tal como lo hicieron los nazis con los alzamientos de los judíos del gueto en Varsovia en 1943, no hay piedad ni misericordia con los inocentes solo que aquí hay una nota adicional, y es que la limpieza que lleva adelante Israel además de durar décadas, desde octubre del 2023 busca eliminar por completo la simiente palestina como una solución final irreversible.

Como es de costumbre, los medios en Buenos Aires que responden a la corporación de medios con cabeceras en EEUU y la UE mantienen un silencio escandaloso pero que no sorprende dado que ya es bien sabido que más allá de la simpatía ideológica dependen financieramente de las contribuciones que aportan los poderosos e influyentes sectores del sionismo.

Pero gracias a Dios hoy día podemos dispensar de los medios convencionales. Las evidencias de la brutalidad deliberada y de la saña están a la vuelta de cada recoveco de los escombros en Gaza. Solo un ejército de asesinos y psicópatas puede justificar las masacres contra niños como una mera afición. Incluso más, es tanta la impunidad con la que se creen que muchos de los efectivos de las FDI no tienen empacho en subir posteos aberrantes donde muestran lo que hacen. 

ISRAEL TAMBIÉN USA EL HAMBRE COMO UN ARMA QUE IMPACTA ESPECIALMENTE SOBRE LOS NIÑOS PALESTINOS

Las estadísticas reales de los asesinatos cometidos por Israel van mucho más allá de las cifras que se han publicado y que refieren conservadoramente a unos 47000 civiles palestinos. La realidad informaría de números mayores. La elevación de estas cifras pasa por considerar todas las formas en que han muerto las victimas que van desde las más violentas como las bombas, baleados, aplastados por los escombros, pasando por formas más sufrientes y lentas como el hambre, enfermedades y la falta de tratamientos por escases de medicamentos y falta de médicos varios de ellos arrestados (quienes son torturados), asesinados o desaparecidos por los sionistas.

Hoy mismo y mientras se escribe este artículo, Gaza se halla bajo una nueva y brutal operación de limpieza y la única ayuda que tienen los pobladores palestinos contra esta embestida de las FDI son las facciones de la resistencia que pese a los intentos de erradicación y descredito ante su gente, sigue en pie. De no ser por esta oposición notoriamente asimétrica y desventajosa los planes de israelíes de usurpar toda la franja hace tiempo habrían sido una realidad. La impunidad de este estado es total y tanto es, que ya no oculta sus ansias de matar a cuantos se les cruce enfrente sin importar que sean dignatarios y representantes extranjeros. En ese sentido y viendo el tuerto desempeño de las instancias judiciales internacionales descaradamente influenciados por la política, los mismos sionistas han hecho carne esta cuestión ¿Quién va a hacer algo contra nosotros?

Como todo régimen criminal necesita disfrazar sus bestialidades detrás de historias épicas y justificaciones presuntamente sostenidas por la divinidad. Israel y el actual régimen extremista liderado por el sionista revisionista Netanyahu echa mano de la teología y las historias bíblicas patriarcales para argumentar que los palestinos son la heredad de aquellos enemigos de los hebreros en tiempos de Esaú (1600 ac), un reduccionismo simplista que insulta a la inteligencia de propios y extraños.

Ni los palestinos son los amalecitas de aquel entonces ni Netanyahu y su estado son la representación de Dios.

En lo que respecta al supuesto mediador (EEUU), hace tiempo que ha quedado claro que no juega ese papel. Incluso las ricas monarquías árabes del golfo que claramente le han dado la espalda a lo que sucede en palestina, se están alineando detrás de un nuevo plan de un “Medio Oriente como centro del mundo” esbozado por Donald Trump y sus think tanks en donde lo único que interesa son los negocios y las ganancias. Algunos creen que esto significaría darle la espalda a Israel cuando en realidad es solo una estratagema más para, por el contrario, reforzar su posición.

Ante estas muy complejas circunstancias y que son notablemente adversas para los palestinos la única vía para salvar ya no la integridad de la franja de Gaza sino las vidas de quienes aún no han sido asesinados es una intervención militar con capacidad de repeler a las FDI y obligarlas a retirarse de la zona. Si bien es fácil decirlo, ello es muy complicado de realizar pero ante la gravedad de la situación no habría otra opción. Los voluntarios sobran (Yemen e  Iraq son ejemplo de ello) y las ansias de auxilio están a flor de piel. Ante todo esto, solo falta responder una pregunta ¿Quiénes respaldarían la empresa?

miércoles, 21 de mayo de 2025

 

COLD PEACE

The negotiations that Trump set in motion on the war in Ukraine would not be about peace but a bailout for Kiev. If Moscow is convinced of this, what would a credible peace look like?

 

By Sidney Hey

By now there is no doubt that Trump's promise to stop the war in Ukraine in less than 24 hours has failed. But beyond considering this as yet another broken promise[1] from a liar and without considering for a moment his secret meddling in the conflict, it is a fact that informs that Washington is no longer in total control of the geopolitical strings, how is this graphed?

The emergence of a coalition of European ‘willingness’[2] to continue hostilities is one such sign. Keir Starmer and Emanuel Macron have cared little for Trump's overtures and to make this clear, they have saved their speeches and got down to work by continuing their support for the truce violations agreed between 8-10 May and which continue to this day. On top of this, we see how their budget allocations and those of all NATO members are rising to fund defence, with Poland (a major anti-Russian actor) already spending 4% of its BIP[3] in this area. Five years from now these ‘willing’ leaders intend to create a pan-European army that will be heavily financed and possibly led by Germany, how should Moscow take this?

If the West (meaning Washington and the EU) were really interested in peace, they would not have boycotted the March 2022[4] talks at an early stage, they would not have instigated Kiev to continue the war and even less, to join NATO with the undeniable intention of cornering the Russian Federation. Nor should we forget that it was Trump himself in his 45th administration who imposed sanctions on Moscow, provided military and intelligence assistance to Kiev and gave it the tools to murder the people of Donbass. With these precedents it is very clear that they never sought peace and if their protégé Fuhrer Zelensky has asked for negotiations in Istanbul with Putin it is for some desperate stratagem and nothing more.

For the time being, talks began in Istanbul on Friday 16 May, but without the presence of any of the leaders involved. Although Volodomyr Zelensky did travel with his entourage[5], Vladimir Putin did not attend for the simple reason that - among others - he considers Kiev's ‘Führer’ not to be legitimised to negotiate. That is why he sent an entourage of second-tier officials. This unleashed a fit of hysteria in the Ukrainian leader, who had no choice but to wait outside the room where the commissions met.  The only positive outcome of the meeting was the agreement to exchange a thousand prisoners on each side. If we were talking about another country that was not a power like Russia, these negotiations would not exist and the conditions would be imposed on the loser by force. The difference here is that Zelensky's neo-Nazi regime is a protégé of the West and that is the reason for all this scenography.

In fact, it is the Russian Federation that has won the victory on the battlefields, and that is non-negotiable for Moscow. If it were not for the material cooperation of the US and its Atlanticist lackeys (especially Britain and France), the UAF would no longer exist and today it would simply not even have ammunition for its rifles. In view of this, anyone should ask themselves why they should negotiate with the loser?

Likewise, although Donald Trump made peace negotiations one of the pillars of his campaign, there is no doubt that he is a continuation (in his own style) of the Atlanticist plans, since if he cannot impose his criteria on Vladimir Putin, he has threatened to increase sanctions to catastrophic levels. Under these parameters it is clear that there can be no talk of negotiation but rather of extortion, and it is clear that Moscow will not allow this. 

If international organisations such as the United Nations and the International Criminal Court really worked, a multinational force with a public prosecutor would have raided the ‘Mariyinsky’ government palace in Kiev more than a month ago to arrest Zelensky and his collaborators... but this is not happening because of the well-known political interference and dirty deals that intoxicate their functions.

Peace is certainly not business. If there is anyone who is fattening the bank accounts of the arms industry in the West and the politicians who promote them, it is Volodomyr Zelensky and his cronies. You see, without the Ashkenazi ‘Fuhrer’ in Kiev, how would they place and test their products? Moreover, for Zelensky the end of the war would simply be a death sentence and a process of disintegration of the Ukrainian neo-Nazi structure. For his corrupt officials, those fat 100 million dollars cheques that Zelensky used to bring back from his visits to Washington would no longer arrive. At the same time it would mean cutting off the fabulous business deals that many European and US arms contractors, and many EU political officials are involved, have been profiting from. The latter would also expose to the light of day the huge financial dealings that have been taking place within NATO, especially those detected within the NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA)[6] with the black sales of ammunition and drones for money laundering purposes.

As can be seen, the stakes are high, although the values differ depending on which side you look at it. From the West as we see it, and specifically from Washington and Brussels, the end of the war would mean (in addition to all this scandal) losing the geopolitical arm wrestling with Russia, while for Moscow it would simply be the recognition of respect for its sovereignty and strategic security in the face of the already exposed plans of the Atlantic organisation and its supporters in Washington to try to undermine the Federation regardless of the means to do so.

Donald Trump should know that his Russian counterpart will not bend to such tactics. Even in Washington, they have known this before. Seeking a direct confrontation against the Russian Federation would be suicidal and that is why they have been implementing hybrid warfare tactics such as the use of economic sanctions (that Trump threatens to aggravate), terrorism, piracy and psychological warfare through the media and despite this, they have not achieved their goals. As part of this harassment, the recurrent actions of ‘Estonian pirates’[7] - a clear euphemism - against ships bound for Russian ports in the Baltic with the support of NATO units (mainly Polish) are not exactly supportive of Trump's vaunted good auspices. While the US president is not directly responsible for these actions, no one would believe that with his inauguration he is not aware of them and apparently does nothing to prevent them. Putin might well question him: What are you playing at, Donald?

In the light of this picture, trust is nowhere to be seen and Donald Trump's blunders are helping to deepen the situation. Either NATO's support for the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev is stopped as an immovable factor in the equation, or there will be no other way than an icy peace. 

 

 



martes, 20 de mayo de 2025

 

MODI'S MISSTEP

What prompted the Narendra Modi government to launch an attack on Pakistan?

 

By Sir Charlattam

A week and a half ago, after the brutal attack on 22 April in Indian-controlled Kashmir, Narendra Modi's government took the dangerous decision to launch an attack on Pakistan on the grounds that it is supporting Kashmiri Islamic resistance groups from there.

In the meantime, beyond the brutal attack and the immediate accusation that the Indian government launched against its neighbour, there is no hard evidence or official claims about the attack, so what were Modi's elements of conviction to authorise such a decision?

The surprise attacks began on 7 May on nine enclaves in Pakistani territory, killing more than 26 civilians, injuring dozens more and destroying mosques and several family homes. Following condemnation by the government in Islamabad, the response was swift and Pakistani forces responded with several attacks against India, and even as the days passed hostilities continued with some frustrated attempts to impose a ceasefire.

The timing of this escalation could not have been more complex and timely for some.

While trying to put an end to the war in Ukraine and Israel was preparing for a new mopping up operation in the Gaza Strip, a terrorist attack in a tourist area of Pahalgam in Kashmir coincidentally triggered a chain of consequences that diverted attention to that area, where the fighting has not yet stopped.

It seems that Modi and his generals have tried to recreate the doctrine of their Israeli allies, which is unlimited retaliation against an entire community without respecting boundaries or distinguishing between combatants and civilians. No one is surprised that this approach is shared by Zionists and Indian nationalists, especially those in the ruling party, for both share a common thread, namely hatred of Muslims.

Despite Washington's appearance to convince the parties to stop the hostilities, this has not happened, demonstrating a notable loss of influence. For the time being, and contrary to the expectations of the Indian military, the Pakistani response has been harsher than expected and has set them back with heavy losses. In light of this, there are many questions that Indian politicians and especially the opposition to Modi should ask themselves: has Modi acted in a rash and unconscionable manner without measuring the consequences for India, and if he has a satisfactory answer to that question, has he considered regional stability and peace with such a decision?

Politically, Modi believes he is above international law, just like his colleague in Tel Aviv who can apparently carry out genocide without any action having been taken against him so far. Geopolitically, his closeness to the Washington-Brussels-Tel Aviv axis is seen as a security card for his political aspirations to establish a pro-Western India in the region.

From that perspective Modi acts as an agent for such interests and in that plan he can only unleash a great deal of suspicion among his neighbours about his every move. China is undoubtedly foremost among them who view with justifiable concern this kind of reaction which is nothing more than the importation of proven failed and inhumanly cruel doctrines.

With reference to the military issue, it can be seen that India's action was based on a prejudiced assessment and not on reliable and accurate information. There is no doubt that the Indian generals gambled on this move keeping in mind the complicated socio-political situation in Pakistan and also without weighing the actual military capabilities of their adversary. It seems that Indian intelligence reports have either not reflected the real potentialities of their adversary or directly underestimated them. Perhaps the Pakistanis were smarter and kept them well hidden. It is known that there is a bilateral arms deal between China and Pakistan that has provided the latter's armed forces with high-tech equipment.

Nor should we forget the cooperation that exists in the field of the development of nuclear reactors provided by China for power generation.

Reports from reliable sources in the area on the evening of 8 May, who have witnessed some of the largest air engagements so far this century, have pointed to the outstanding performance of Pakistani units, especially their JF-17s, J-10Cs and J-35s, which were able to hold off Indian aircraft (some of them of Western origin) in their attempts to penetrate Pakistani airspace. J-10Cs and J-35s that were able to hold off Indian aircraft (some of which were of Western origin) in their attempts to penetrate Pakistani airspace. 

At the same time, ground units, particularly mechanised infantry units, have also performed very well in skirmishes with their Indian counterparts on the line of contact. 

Beyond the concerns and harsh recriminations that have undoubtedly been voiced within the Modi government, those who have been most concerned about these developments are the Americans and their British counterparts, who view with great concern the good performance of Chinese products, which the Pentagon has been tracking for years to determine China's military capabilities. Expectations and planning for the Indo-Pacific situation under the guise of protecting the island of Taiwan.