INTERNATIONAL
"CIRCUS AND ELECTIONS IN U.S.A."
How affect the new US administration Argentina according to each of the prospective candidates
By Dany Smith
Like a screwball comedy is involved, primary
elections in the United States appears to address a hilarious end and certainly
very predictable. It is beyond the multifaceted offer of candidates in which
the propaganda of American communicational pro-establishment clings to showcase
its much-touted "democracy" actually a closed and very far to the
decisions of ordinary people electoral system hides and directly serving elites
that make up the American deep state.
You can not deny that the whole media
circus around the political campaign that is plotted through discussions,
debates and even parodies performed in major television shows like
"Saturday Night Live" broadcast on NBC, they are a powerful stimulus
to draw the attention of a public that, shaken by the harsh daily realities,
seen in appearances as Democratic candidates like Hillary Clinton or Bernie
Sanders crossed with Republicans like Ted Cruz, John Kasich or the ineffable
Donald Trump in apparent irreconcilable strife of ideas where all while offering
magic solutions to the serious situation in which the state of the union is in
the grip.
But will the governors of every state of
the Union, who will then elect their respective presidential candidate,
weighing for it the opinion of entities such as the National Governors
Association that brings together what could be called, to the innate cream of
society white Americans, the conservative spirit of the US and is represented
in so-called WASP (white Anglo-Saxxon Protest), so concerned about preserving
the purity of American society. As pointed out interesting articles Therry
Meyssan journalists (v. Who will be the next president of the United States? Http://www.voltairenet.org/article191079.html
), candidates for president do not bring any government program or for the
common good solution since the only and main interest in this curious
"democratic" system, only it seeks to benefit their constituents who
in turn are influenced by interests of the most varied nature.
All this mess of candidates and alleged proposals
for overcome change the Obama era, the truth is that, by analyzing each of the
possible candidates for the White House, have in themselves serious and
contradictory situations that can go to the detriment of their governments and
the same country. First we have a strange candidate like Ted Cruz, who can not to
consider with chances to gain the presidency. For many analysts this Hispanic
US citizen and become a Protestant convert is only a model for the ornament and
demonstrating how far a Hispanic can drag to try to be accepted by US political
circles. On the other hand we have Hillary Clinton, senator from the state of
New York and converted into an activist for women's rights, he believes it has
gone into the pocket to women voters and several feminist organizations that
border with the pro- activism Lesbian. But although the facade of the New York
lawyer was present as a "feminist progressivism," the fact that
behind her, along with her neurotic and unpredictable genius depend criminal
cases for serious crimes including the suspicious death of the US ambassador in
Benghazi in 2012 and its implications inexplicable matters are as murky as the
appearance of "ISIL" in Syria, talks to support them monetarily and
with the provision of weapons. And if that were not enough, the farce of the
"Operation Geronimo" in which supposedly were killed Bin Ladem and
threw him into the sea.
Another candidate in dance is the bizarre
entrepreneur Donald Trump who positioned in one of the wings of republicanism,
is the representative of an American populism that aims to move away from the
elitist political class that has become rich at the expense of their positions
within the public function. In this sense, Trump threatens pro-establishment
and is not at all desired him as occupant of the White House.
But what can benefit Argentina to succeed
Clinton as a Democratic or a Republican like Trump? Honestly no change to the
agenda of Argentina except maybe and according to the positions that have been
discoursing each of these candidates, it is possible that their policies for
the Southern Cone and especially for Argentina, has some shades but nothing
that makes a strong difference. One thing is sure is that whoever was elected
president, Buenos Aires must dance to the tune of the White House. What if
broadly can foresee is that if Donald Trump won the presidency, would portend
what many analysts as the return of a US isolationist something impossible in
the world of today, or rather, the implementation of the brake expansionist and
interventionist policies that Barack Obama continued his predecessors. This
will certainly cause concern in conservative circles both Republicans and
Democrats and especially in -AIPAC Zionist pressure groups and others which
clearly has put the eccentric Republican candidate in the crosshairs of
potential obstacles should arrive at The presidency.
On the other hand, if Hillary Clinton were
elected as president, it is expected a completely contrary policy which
outlines the billionaire candidate. Domestically Clinton's promises to improve
the economic and employment situation is a "recreation" of those
raised by Obama when he aspired to the presidency.
Externally, the position has
shown when development functions in the State Department closer to the "Pentagon
hawks" and "neocon" than the historical stance Democrat;
although it must be emphasized that recent history has made it clear that
Republicans and Democrats are only adjustable variables and the interests of
the State of the Union which in turn are influenced by pressure from powerful
groups and individuals positions. This is where lies the panacea and the real
possibilities for a candidate to win the presidency. In that sense, Clinton
shake ties with the government of Macri in a geopolitical axis to try to argue
and justify authorship of Iran in the terrorist actions of the nineties in
Argentina and even the authorship of the assassination of federal prosecutor
Alberto Nisman .
In this sense, the position of Senator of
NY receives much welcome the support of the major pro-Israeli lobbies and
powerful individuals like Paul Singer, Goldman Sacks and many others, linked to
this Zionist ideology, they are entering Argentina for the auspicious position
of the Argentine government.
Thus both Clinton and Trump, they must go
through the Zionist testing of these groups, leaving it clear that the position
that most pleased unleashed among its adherents has been the declamations
Avenue candidate in "extreme feminist".
Note but, as each of them have passed through
the filter of the powerful AIPAC, which this March 21 last, the Clinton
candidate promised among other things, harass more decisively to Iran by
imposing the toughest possible sanctions , obtaining his speech by a burst of
applause (v. TIME. "Hillary Clinton speech to AIPAC." http://time.com/4265947/hillary-clinton-aipac-speech-transcript/
). Nor should we fail to note that the position of Hillary Clinton is applauded
by international Zionists who expect the deepening of the actions of EEU in
support of Israel for a good time, complete with claims and recognition of a
state Palestinian.
Finally, the position of Hillary Clinton
welcomes undoubtedly the powerful sector of the defense industry with this type
of expectations, promises to revive the lucrative defense contracts and
development of new weapons to try surely in a new war scenario, with a
government at the hands of Clinton leads predict no margin for error, the
expansion of military operations to the waters of the Persian Gulf with
objective at this time, to attack, or try some provocation against the Islamic
Republic of Iran. In this scenario, Argentina could be complicated by its new
geopolitical positioning without neglecting the possibility that becomes an
active part in joint operations with US armed forces in other latitudes,
especially in the Middle East.
