“THE SNAKE'S EGG”
Why is it very convenient for Washington for the
Taliban to take power in Afghanistan? who else would benefit from this?
Por Yossi
Tevi
Last week's bomb attacks at the Kabul airport left many
questions hanging in the air. Were they rivals of the Taliban or a CIA
operation? This last question in turn raises another crucial question. What
would be the purpose of those brutal attacks that even killed US Marines?
To try to shed
light on these events and understand the logic (twisted by the way), we must
start from the idea that what the media today talk about as “ISIS-Khorasan” is
an extension of ISIS (or Daesh) that of that group that appeared out of
nowhere. on Iraq in June 2014. That in turn was the continuation of a lie
inserted in Iraq in 2006 after the planned elimination of the head of “Al
Qaeda-Iraq” Abu Muzab Al Zarqawi, who for Washington had ceased to be
functional in in the midst of a complex and dynamic scenario that required a
renewed counterinsurgency strategy. From there, a new group called
"Islamic State of Iraq" (ISI) made its appearance, which, formed with
foreign mercenaries, varied in the number of members and was temporarily led by
ghostly characters such as “Abu Omar Al Baghdadi”, Abu Ayub Al Masri and the
last these characters (the one who had the greatest role behind) Abu Bakr Al
Baghdadi, an archetype invented by US intelligence and its Israeli partners.
The black
flag with the inscription of the “Shahada” that identifies “ISIS” has been
taken from the interpretations of eschatology. Here you see a group of
supposedly Arab men brandishing the black cloth but in reality they are
impostors performing in a montage produced by the Israeli Mossad.
When intelligence
agencies build a hoax, they do so on the basis of accurate and circumstantial
information on the objective they are pursuing. As an example of this, we saw
it when Israel in the mid-sixties wanted to counteract the nationalist
militancy of the PLO, they fostered and even financed religious militancy in
the occupied territories that would later transform into radical groups such as
“Islamic Jihad” and “Hamas”.
With regard to the
new franchise called “ISIS-Khorasan”, the image, symbolism and of course its
ideology has clearly been taken from the theology more precisely from Islamic
eschatology but as expected, adulterating and manipulating the interpretations
of the Muslim scholars.
The trick lies in
artificially recreating the symbology and forms that this part of the Semitic
religion describes that will impact the minds of the most aroused and
superstitious in the community. It also targets populations mired in despair
and misery who will be easy to manipulate with this type of falsehood. With
this manipulation of the texts they pursue a psychological nature that seeks to
take advantage of the behaviors and multiple idiosyncrasies of the millions of
faithful that make up the UMMA (Islamic Community) that extends around the
world, especially in the extremist sectors that exist in all religions, but
unlike Islam, they are not the target of a systematic scheme extensively and
persistently promoted, financed and directed from well-determined Western
countries.
It goes without
saying that this is a scandal and an affront to the Islamic faith and to the
Muslims themselves (which has been spreading over three decades) who then
become the target of stigmatization and the scapegoat through of the media
product of these murky governmental elaborations in which, in addition to the
Western media conglomerates, several Arab-Islamic governments unfortunately
collaborate directly or indirectly.
These plans,
implemented in Iraq, Yemen and Syria, would have failed in Afghanistan without
clearly highlighting that in the attempt they have caused enormous damage among
the civilian population and among their own men. Beyond the fact that the
Taliban is a Sunni Islamic branch under an interpretation adjusted to its
locality and tribal customs of the Pashtun majority, with dogmatic and
ideological roots in the Pakistani Madrasahs financed and encouraged by the CIA
since the late 1970s (1978 ) and with the intentional extension in Afghanistan,
they do not adhere to the twisted interpretation that ISIS makes of Islam.
Although for some
those fiery admonitions of the self-proclaimed caliph “Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi”
made in the Great Mosque of Mosul back in July 2014 border on appearances with
the “Wahabi” vision of Saudi Islam, the truth is that the Saudis themselves
unconsciously listening to him they frowned as a sign of misunderstanding or
disagreement with it. In addition to showing the artificiality of their
ideology, the absence of that alleged analogy that the Western media
continually tries to argue and warned the Taliban about this artificiality,
they fight them without quarter.
There is a problem
that persists in the West and especially in the Anglo-Saxon world that comes
from its colonial times and it is based on the belief that the natives of the
countries involved are still ignorant, easy to co-opt and deceive. When the
United States and Great Britain invaded Iraq and strange attacks against
civilians began to occur, no one believed that there were characters like Abu
Muzab Al Zarqawi or Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi, much less that the perpetrators were
Iraqis expressing many that they were the illusion of the invaders themselves.
In Iraq, when the
first “ISI” cell appeared in 2006, its actions were so indiscriminate against
civilians that the Iraqi resistance fought them without quarter. By the time it
reappeared as the firepower that we saw in 2014 focused its attacks and
sophisticated digital propaganda against the Shiites, being incisive in this
objective, leaving aside the Americans and even the Israelis. So evident was
their selectivity that in Israel many Israelis made jokes and parodies about
who "Daesh" really worked for.
With this in view
and transferred to what is happening in Afghanistan, we see that
"ISIS" will become the antagonist of the Taliban on the ground,
obviously alongside other local groups such as the Tashikos and lies with which
Washington will use to maintain instability in the region as part of a strategy
of controlled chaos that aims in the medium term to compromise strategically
important spaces for both China and Russia. Let us not forget that during the
disintegration of the USSR in the 1990s, British MI-6 and other NATO agencies
supported the Chechen Muslim pro-independence activists in a variety of ways
with the aim of controlling the Caucasus.
But there is also
another interested party with another objective as or more important than the
one set out here. We know that Israel is extremely concerned about the nuclear
developments of the Arab-Islamic countries and in that sense, it has done
everything it could to cut off aspirations for this type of development. This
is how in June 1981 he bombed the “Osirak” complex in Iraq, since 2009 he has
been assassinating several Iranian nuclear scientists -the last Mohsen
Fakhrizadeh- and in recent times he has carried out cyberattacks against
the Iranian facilities in Natanz. Pakistan was not going to be the exception.
The Pakistani
nuclear program has been one of the issues that for decades has taken away the
sleep of the Zionist elite in and outside of Israel who, through their
transnational organizations such as AIPAC and their lobbyists in the US
Congress, from the Democratic administration of Jimmy Carter has so far tried
to argue the danger to regional stability if Pakistan had its own nuclear
development. Even to sow greater discord and mistrust, they try to influence
this discourse in India, taking advantage of the border conflicts that still
exist in the Kashmir region.
But the
circumstantiality of the cold war and the Iranian revolution in 1979 cooled the
expectations of the Zionists to agitate in Washington an early path for the
sabotage and destruction of the Pakistani nuclear program, these intentions
being totally blocked during the Reagan administration that needed Pakistan to
destabilize the pro-Soviet government of Afghanistan.
Undoubtedly, the
"ISIS-Khorasan" fits into this planning and that is why in the
support and everything related to the formation of this impossibly Islamist
group, it will seek to destabilize Afghanistan and the entire region as long as
the Taliban does not eliminate them first.
