WORLD CUP OF
HYPOCRESY
What could be the reasons behind a World Cup that has
generated so little enthusiasm for football? A tournament of hypocrites with
geopolitical agendas, perhaps?
By Sir Charlattam
As aliens have recently become all the rage following the convenient
declassification of some CIA files, perhaps they, who see things from above,
will be able to spot the great hypocrisy we are witnessing with the World Cup.
Why? There are plenty of reasons. Given that it is being held in a country that
is perpetrating an atrocious genocide in Palestine and has started yet another
war – and that, based on its track record alone, its political and military
officials should long since have been tried before the International Criminal
Court there is no better description for this spectacle.
Apart from this, I cannot deny my hopes for Thomas
Tuchel’s ‘Three Lions’ team; it is also true to say that winning the cup would
be a huge relief for Keir Starmer’s Labour government, and that is something I
would not welcome.
There is no doubt that the awarding and organisation
of this tournament in the US has been pre-arranged, and there is even less
doubt about the role Donald Trump himself has played in it.
As well as the fabulous business opportunities it
represents for sports entrepreneurs and, in particular, for FIFA, this
spectacle is, in the current circumstances, the Roman-style ‘bread and
circuses’ so desperately needed to cover up the mess caused by the policies of
a US administration deeply committed to the ideology of an extremist faction of
the Israeli elite.
The commercial aspect of this spectacle is revealed by
the fact that it is the most expensive World Cup in history and, at the same
time, the one in which the host country’s inhabitants have the least interest.
Added to this, it is a spectacle that bears more resemblance to an exclusive
club like the ‘Cocktail Queen’ with entry restricted by the militarised police
of Homeland Security than to a public celebration. Highly sophisticated police
state controls involving, amongst other delightful measures, biometric
identification and information on visitors’ ideological leanings extracted from
social media profiles – a true manifestation of the technological fascism in
which we find ourselves. This has not
interested the FIFA leadership, and they have even gone further in
demonstrating their willingness to act as the doormat for an administration
riddled with inconsistency, to put it mildly.
The factors that lead me to say this are evident in
the strict controls, particularly focused on visitors’ ideological and
religious affiliations, to grant entry to the US. The case of the Somali
referee Omar Abdulkadir Artan is one of the scandalous instances among hundreds
of others linked to football who were prevented from participating. So whilst
FIFA President Gianni Infantino smiles and shakes hands with the president of a
country that boasts (or at least used to) of being democratic, at the entrance
journalists, commentators, players and referees are barred from participating because
the conclusions reached no doubt by an FBI AI system or by cross-referencing
the databases of various intelligence agencies (blacklists) deem them unwelcome
simply for being Arab, Muslim or African, or because they are perceived as having
the wrong mindset by the Zionist lobbies of AIPAC or their counterparts in
Ireland, who are already inciting MI5 thugs in Ulster to stir up hatred against
immigrants.
A prime example of this abhorrent discrimination can
be seen in the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s national team, which was
prevented from entering the US and had to be received and accommodated on
Mexican territory. If we look at this through the lens of rational logic, it
makes no sense whatsoever, since it is the Iranians who were attacked and must
now tolerate being treated as suspects.
For the White House administration, this is a very
convenient event to divert attention from the complex issues they are currently
grappling with, including the dire state of the domestic economy (inflation
increasing) with soaring fuel prices exacerbated by the closure of the Strait
of Hormuz and the tortuous negotiations with Iran to try to achieve what they
failed to secure on 3 February. We could also add the explosive revelations by
the outgoing Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Tulsi Gabbard, regarding
the network of 120 biowarfare laboratories funded by taxpayers’ money and
scattered across the globe, some 40 of which are in Ukraine. Let us not forget
the involvement of the previous Democratic administration, with the involvement
of former President Joe Biden’s son and the whole matter of his dealings with
METABIOTA in Ukraine.
On this latter matter, if investigations are launched
at the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) where the Russians have
provided a great deal of evidence regarding the link between these
biolaboratories and the development of SARS-CoV-2, amongst other pathogens certain
matters concerning the British special branch at Port Down could come to light.
Well, gentlemen, all this is just a big smokescreen
that will hide the harsh reality we find ourselves in for which our governments
are responsible for a month. The question is: what will happen when the
distraction is over?





