“THE CONTAINER
AGENT”
New clues point to
a hypothesis that emerged from US researchers denying the federal government's
version of the origin of the COVID pandemic in 2019.Will there be the
corresponding investigations by Congress?
Por Dany Smith
New clues point to a hypothesis that emerged
from US researchers denying the federal government's version of the origin of
the COVID pandemic in 2019.Will there be the corresponding investigations by
Congress?
Since the alleged first
outbreak of the SARS-COV, better known as COVID 19, was made public in the city
of Wuhan, China, the western media did not stop talking about the "Chinese
virus", the pangolin, the bats and the responsibilities of the People's
Republic for the unleashing of this plague. As often happens, nothing new under
the sun. It is known that the media in the West, and particularly those in
South America, are subordinate to the editorial of the guidelines in
Washington, therefore, if they shout something there, those below will
replicate it as an echo.
With regard to Argentines,
the rule does not change, and as their colleagues in the region do, they repeat
at the bottom of the letter the story of the north.
But despite this, regional
public opinion has evolved to such an extent that these "media" that
impose seriousness and a flowery commitment to the truth, today have a pitiful
degree of credibility, something that shows a severe crisis for the business of
the information that has not even been able to be alleviated with the robotic
editors of the big American media. A matter as delicate and sinister as this,
which has cost the lives of thousands of inhabitants of this dangerous world,
should have been treated with the greatest impartiality possible, but financial
commitments always come first.
Two years after that event,
new elements come to light today that add to those that we had previously
exposed referring to the artificiality of the "virus" and that very
lightly the governments with the machinery of disinformation of the media
pointed their fingers against raw food and bats for consumption sold in a
public market in Wuhan. Let's not even forget that as soon as the treatment of
this began, in the United States some contradictions came to light in the Sinophobic
version that emanated from some White House officials. That was enough to
accuse the Chinese, for their eating habits and customs, of being responsible
for this pandemic. This opened the door to all kinds of "science
fiction" speculations that had their five minutes of fame and they, with
unreliable participation from the WHO, were aired from the rooftops by western
media conglomerates with the sole intention of emphasizing 24 hours a day and
seven days a week that the "virus had emerged in China."
Among other consequences
that we saw in the West for this stigmatizing story and that was expressed very
strongly in the US was the "Sinophobia" which is hatred against the
Chinese and that cost many citizens of this origin to be insulted, beaten or
even killed by Western citizens convinced of the official account.
Here in Buenos Aires, nobody
knew a damn about what was happening between the US and China, but as always,
it was enough to nod to the biased speculations of CNN and its spectrum
colleagues. Perhaps the economists who have their bank accounts outside of
Argentina were aware of the commercial tensions that were on the rise between
the two actors, but even they were not informed of the darker circumstances
surrounding the conflict. From there, any simple opinionologist or journalists
made this a simple tabloid show of terror.
The conflict between the US
and China is beyond trade. During the administration of Donald Trump, they
tried by all means to harm Asian policies by printing trade sanctions and
tariffs on products seeking markets throughout the American continent. Another
of the democratic features that characterize the US. Likewise, that did not
have the expected success and from then on other plans were drawn up to try to
ruin Chinese expansionism. Another big problem for the US is undoubtedly the
constant Chinese technological advance (despite some limitations in the access
of certain implements) that became public with the development of
intrusion-proof Software for mobile telephony from "Huawei" (due to
the CIA and NSA), of the 5G that has been giving so many questions in Great
Britain, especially and the most worrying thing, the successful development of
an Artificial Intelligence (AI) called “AlphaGo” that could put the military
area in trouble for the Pentagon. The Chinese model that combines an
omnipresent one-party state that allows private investment for public
developments has proven against other examples that it is a mix that can work
very well if there are rules that are enforced.
Under the direction of the
state, megaprojects based on medium-term technological developments to
modernize the country had moderate successes, but ultimately successful. The
very idea that China continues to work to reach 2025 with greater improvements
in the area of science and technology greatly worries the US and its
partners.
In the feverish heads of the
bureaucrats in Washington with Donald Trump at the head (permeable to the most
ineffable and delusional ideas) and his dark personal advisers -the same
ones who suggested to him to assassinate the Iranian general Qassem Soleimani
and the nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh- began to ruminate on
questions such as How do we stop the Chinese without them realizing that it was
us? The answer had to include some means or weapon that was invisible and, if
possible, invisible to the eyes.
One of the closest and most
influential advisers to President Trump was undoubtedly his son-in-law, the
young Zionist Jared Kushner, who lived conspiring in the office next to his
father-in-law's living room. His contacts as dark as Kushner himself could have
provided whatever he wanted, as long as there was a long-awaited reward. That
was not a problem for Trump, who was used to speaking in that language in which
the exchange of favors and perks mean money. Here the homeland (Homeland) or
the values of democracy do not count and this had already been the case since
before the Bush neocons took power in 2000.
"We have the elements
and surprise on our side", his advisers would have suggested, "we
just need the right time and place." And that was a massive event with
massive public assistance that would take place precisely in Wuhan. The
military world games that would take place between October 18-27, 2019 would be
the opportunity to execute the coup. Coincidentally that same October 18 in New
York while the contingent of the United States Army settled in China, at the
Melinda-Bill Gates Foundation and under the auspices of The Johns Hopkins
Center for Health Security and the World Economic Forum. "Event 201"
was carried out, a very peculiar computer simulation that was only visible to a
select invited audience. In this event, the socio-economic and political effect
that a "pandemic" would produce on a global scale was recreated,
something that would be replicated almost trampoline a year later. Coincidence?
Representatives of the CIA
but not official officials of the federal government were present at this
private event created by supposedly purely scientific interests. Why?
This would not be of
importance if other strange events that occurred within the United States and
not China had occurred previously and contemporaneously. A few months before
these events, in the Washington district about 30 kilometers north of the capital
in the laboratories of "Chemical and Bacteriological Warfare"
(Chemical Warfare) there would have been a contaminant leak that ended up
affecting all the personnel of the base. That fact passed discreetly through
the media and did not go beyond the superficial knowledge of the local
population of Maryland.
According to US sources, in
June 2019 several cases of a kind of influenza were detected that affected the
military and civilian personnel of "Fort Detrick" located in
Maryland, where those laboratories for chemical and bacteriological warfare
were coincidentally located. We say that they were located since after this
incident the facilities would have been dismantled by the government and
secretly moved other laboratories in universities in the country. The outbreak
that was considered an influenza was so strong that by August of that year they
had to seal the base and isolate the infected. Now, was it an accidental leak
or was it a faulty handling of a biological agent made there that produced it? And
if the latter was the case, for what or under what circumstances were these
agents manipulated?
It is known that the US
since the beginning of 2000 has patented a series of viruses elaborated in its
biowar laboratories (which it euphemistically calls Biodefense) and which
coincidentally are of the name SARS that demolishes the imposed surprise of
North American officials before the appearance of SARS-COV2. One of the most
prominent of these officials is Dr. Anthony Fauci, who despite his face of
surprise and concern was during the Reagan and Bush administrations part of the
costly biological weapons programs, which are still available in hot days their
arsenals.
It was within this
particular framework that the government of Donald Trump authorized the participation
of the army in the military games that would take place in China.
Among the 369 army personnel
who were sent to the Wuhan military games in October 2019, some of those
infected in Fort Detrick would have gone who, without visible symptoms, continued
to carry the biological agent within their bodies. Sources claim that the US
delegation stayed very close to the seafood market where the first Chinese
cases would later be reported. There is even another version that indicates
that within the delegation there was only one of those troops with symptoms of
COVID and which had the particularity of being a "super contagious",
a phenomenon of certain organizations that we would later see in other
countries. By October 28, the entire US delegation returned to the US and two
weeks after that date, the first cases of COVID were registered in Wuhan,
spreading uncontrollably in December. The rapid and organized mobilization of
the Chinese security forces in Santiago prevented this from becoming
uncontrollable, something that those who observed the events did not expect.
For Chinese government officials like Foreign Minister Zhao Lijian, “the US
brought the epidemic to Wuhan.”
If this was so, it was a
diabolical maneuver that compromised even his own men-at-arms who were not
infected and who were unaware of what was happening. It is clear that they all
ended up infected, but their personal health situations and that of their
families were under the strict control of their superiors and the US government.
There would lie the impossibility of the government and the Chinese health
establishments to find the so-called “zero case” Chinese in Wuhan simply,
because its origin was not there.
Despite American democratic
boastfulness, these questions greatly upset the Establishment in Washington
both with Trump and currently with Biden. Both respond and are subordinate to
these dark powers that govern the real policy of the Union without accounting
for any of the constitutional springs of the federal state. Even Joe Biden's
announcement to entrust the CIA and the intelligence community with the “investigation”
of the origin of the SARS-COV known as “COVID-19” is clearly a contrived
announcement since (and for those who do not know) This area of governmental
power is not dedicated precisely to being the auxiliary of justice and the law,
but quite the opposite.
For any impartial observer,
all these indications and the possibility of gathering evidence on the events
that have been discussed here, it would be more than enough for the
International Atomic Energy Agency or a special United Nations delegation to
intervene to verify whether the US military installations They comply with the
Convention on the Prohibition of Biological Weapons and even a high
international court such as the International Court of Justice under the orbit
of the UN or even the International Criminal Court, supervised by the EU, could
act ex officio against these particularities. Likewise, and despite such
pompous names, political realism prevails. And that these organizations have
their loyalties firmly held by the monies that support them and it will be very
difficult for some of them “to rattle the cat”.
