“THE G7, FREE
COMMERCIAL AND GEOPOLITICS”
The return of the
club of the rich What are the plans for the post-pandemic agenda?
By Sir Charlattam
Since the beginning of time and since man
became aware of the exercise of power over his fellow men, he was adopting the
most bloody imaginative measures to impose his will on others. In this way,
trade between distant towns expanded with the discovery of unexplored land
routes and navigation, which also created enmities and wars. Trade is an
expression of humanity that contributes to the development of peoples and as
such was and continues to be the target of these tax practices. As commerce has
expanded and made more complex due to great technological and scientific
advances, so have its administrative organizations.
The two great world wars
were set against the background of disputes between colonialist states for
control of vital geographic spaces through which natural resources were
exploited and through which strategic trade routes would pass or pass. The
ideological and political foundations that adorned them (fascism, Nazism,
liberalism and communism) were only a mask to justify these struggles.
With the establishment of
the United Nations in 1945 and the creation of the World Trade Organization, an
attempt was made to regulate the incumbencies of the countries regarding
international trade, trying to avoid the vices and abuses of the past that
ended in the aforementioned wars. But at the same time that this was born, a
new international reality also did so with the so-called “Cold War” that
divided the world into two blocks (east and west). And under this new
framework, they began to manipulate and twist the mandates pursued by the
United Nations Charter and, therefore, the guidelines of freedom,
predictability and the fluidity of trade that the WTO provides
In this general framework,
the Group of six was created in 1975 and a year later it increased to seven
(with the entry of Canada), which today we know as the G-7, which was made up
of the most commercially, financially and militarily powerful countries in the
world. Western Hemisphere. From this forum, which meets every two years, issues
of global economic importance were discussed that especially catered to their
own interests. Being perceived as an elitist club and not representative of the
entire global market, they soon adopted the strategy of accepting other
peripheral members as happened with China, Brazil and South Africa in 1999.
This organization played an
important role in the crisis in the Persian Gulf of 1990 that ended in the 1991
war against Iraq and, of course, in its invasion in 2003. Their concern did not
go through the human consequences that these war campaigns were about to cause,
but rather the impact that they would have on the price of a barrel of oil and
therefore on their economies. Nor should we forget that among its members are
the countries that have promoted the bloodiest hegemonist strategies of the
second decade of this century, the most notable being the one deployed (through
deception and bloody operations) throughout the Middle East and central Asia.
where there are important reserves of oil, gas and coal. That is why when we
hear that its organizational function passes through consensus and
"democratic" deliberation, we certainly see again how that word so
used in Western discourses more than an adjective, sounds more like a
grammatical adornment in the speech.
When a member is accepted
into this select group, they must accept the inherent policy that brings
together all other members. If, on the contrary, any of them makes any movement
or carries out state policies that displease these members, they are expelled.
That was what happened with Russia in 2014, which by not allowing the
deployment of NATO on Ukraine, which as its ultimate goal sought to establish
itself in the Crimean peninsula was simply expelled from the group.
In the current post-pandemic
framework, new problems are presented that put more limitations on that free
trade that only select clubs such as the G-7 enter and that, rather than fight
for that end, only seek to hinder the development of other countries and
competitive markets to which they would like to control. Today mainland China
is their biggest concern for Washington and its group partners. During all the
years of existence. Washington has conditioned the countries that do not want
to accept the G7 rules. This comes to mind after the words that Joe Biden
expressed in the framework of this summit when he referred to "this marked
the return of the United States to multilateralism" trying to argue that
his predecessor in the White House, Donald Trump, had been the unilateralist
exception in American political history which is false. The history of the
United States in this organization has been to intrigue by forming cliques at
the convenience of its own interests.
This year the summit of this
G-7 takes place in Great Britain and this is not by chance. The case of the
North Island is particular and for its interests, directing the group's
commercial agenda within a global crisis created by the spread of SARS-COVID is
central to projecting global British interests outside the EU. Although this
causes controversy and rejection by countries like Germany and France, the
British position will prevail for the sole reason of being the second largest
in the United States.
Ever since London decided to
leave the EU system, it has tried to maneuver so that its company “BREXIT” does
not collapse in its first moments of birth. It was for this reason that despite
Boris Johnson's declamations that Britain was shedding an organization that did
not represent British interests, it tried to remain under the umbrella of the
tariff benefits that the EU provides to its members. But as Johnson knows well
that his mischief would not be tolerated for long, he made the decision to
restructure the area that made the island great and that is, his fleet (naval
power) with which he conquered the seas of the world establishing his imperial
Thalassacracy. with which it controlled trade routes.
As we know, London since the
end of the Second Great War (1945) has always been subordinate to the policies
that Washington has deployed in international settings. That position never
pleased the Foreign Office and when he tried to regain his leading colonial
role together with partners of the same ilk (France and Israel in the 1956 Suez
adventure), he definitively realized that he would accept to remain a mere
co-star of the North American geopolitics. As part of this, it has followed the
policy of sanctions and embargoes that have been imposed unilaterally against
countries that did not align with the White House directives or went against
the plans that the “Think Tanks” of the Department of Justice had already
designed. American state. These commercial strangulation policies that seek to
coerce governments and to revolt entire peoples to remove them, should not be
allowed in the shadow of political-financial and military organizations such as
the G-7. It was for this reason that other countries were adopting their own
organizational forms (such as the BRICS, ALBA and MERCOSUR) to respond to the
powerful influences exerted by these types of groups that have shown to have
political objectives with which to condition the trade and development of the
countries.
------------------
“ATENTADO
CONTRA LA REALIDAD”
Cómo Israel quiere cambiar la realidad de los hechos
más allá de lo creíble
Por Yossi Tevi
Como se ha visto lastimosamente en los medios
argentinos, la secuencia de los hechos que llevaron a desatar los actuales enfrentamientos
entre Israel y la resistencia palestina fue contada a gusto y conveniencia de
la embajada de Israel en Buenos Aires, algo que en realidad no asombra a nadie.
Pero si queremos que la ley tenga el mismo alcance
para todos y se terminen con los mantos de impunidad con los cuales el estado
sionista y sus operadores han venido sorteando todos y cada uno de los crímenes
(los cuales no son pocos) que han cometido a lo largo de 73 años de violencia
institucionalizada, es necesario poner bien en contexto lo que ocurrió en los
últimos enfrentamientos y para ello, nos centraremos en un episodio puntual.
El ataque del 11 de mayo último contra el edificio
“Al Shuruk” no fue motivado por los ataques de “Hamas” contra Tel Aviv (como
muy livianamente informan los desinformadores argentinos) ni siquiera contra
los asentamientos de Ashdot y Ashquelon. Ello no ocurriría sino recién después
de lo que Israel iba a cometer. El brutal ataque realizado ese martes 11 con
bombas anti bunkers (que causan un daño superior a las bombas convencionales) que
demolieron a esta edificación que se ubicaba en el centro urbano de Gaza fue en
represalia por el discurso televisado del Secretario general de Hamas Ismail
Haniyeh condenando la sentencia judicial del 6 de mayo emitida por un tribunal
israelí que legitimó (en base a títulos
falsificados) las apropiaciones arbitrarias de viviendas palestinas en el
barrio de Sheikh Jarrah. Fue por esta pieza legal que los extremistas judíos
que ya venían hostigando a los palestinos de Jerusalen, el 10 de mayo llegaron
al barrio árabe para tratar de expulsar y apoderarse de las viviendas desatando
un pandemónium.
Un dia después, el 7 de mayo las fuerzas israelíes
llevaban adelante una cruenta represión contra los musulmanes que oraban en la
Explanada de las Mezquitas y que se extendería hasta el 13 de mayo lo que generó más choques y enfrentamientos que
prosiguieron con la profanación de la Mezquita “Al Aqsa” por la violenta
intrusión de los policías judíos, algo que viene siendo una costumbre desde que
el líder del partido “Likud” Ariel Sharon y sus partidarios en Septiembre del
2000 se hizo presente escoltados por fuerzas policiales con el solo motivo de
provocar a los palestinos que allí oraban. En aquel momento esta conducta fue
condenada por varios funcionarios en Tel Aviv como fue el caso del Ministro de
Justicia Yossi Beilin quien dijo que “Sharon lo había transformado en una
provocación gratuita”, pero más tarde quedo claro que las provocaciones de
Sharon sirvieron (políticamente a Netanyahu) para deshacer los acuerdos
vigentes, destruir la infraestructura de Autoridad Nacional Palestina (ANP) e
incluso justificar el asesinato de Arafat.
El martes 11 Ismail Haniyeh emite un mensaje que
pudo ser trasmitido desde las instalaciones de la cadena palestina “Al Aksa TV”
que precisamente se ubicaba junto a las oficinas de otras corresponsalías de
prensa extranjera en el edificio, se dio en este contexto y ello estaba dejando
muy mal parado al estado israelí y fue allí que Netanyahu y sus asesores no
dudaron en dar la orden. Como se pudo ver, no hubo contemplaciones en Tel Aviv para
censurar de la manera más terrorífica y despiadada lo que molestaba de forma
caustica a Benjamín Netanyahu y a todos los sionistas que sustentan la política
de “Apartheid” ¿Cuál fue la reacción de la prensa occidental? En la mayoría de
casos, la prensa gráfica solo dedicó dos líneas en sus editoriales informando
el hecho sin hacer un mínimo comentario sobre su ilegalidad y brutalidad. Por
el contrario, la organización no gubernamental de “Reporteros Sin Fronteras”
(RSF) no solo denunció públicamente este hecho como un “crimen de guerra” que
se enmarca en el artículo 8 del Estatuto de Roma sino que hizo las
correspondientes presentaciones judiciales ante la Corte Penal Internacional lo
que deja en claro, a que grado se encuentran comprometidas financiera e
ideológicamente las empresas de medios occidentales.
Eso no es algo nuevo en la política israelí. Durante
la agresión al Líbano de 2006 las imágenes que trasmitían la TV libanesa y en
especial las de la cadena “Al Manar” financiada por el Movimiento de
resistencia “Hesbollah” eran tan gráficas sobre la brutalidad y los daños que
los aviones israelíes estaban causando sobre la población civil (en particular
contra niños y las ambulancias) que, tratando de acallar su difusión (por
ordenes de Olmert y Peretz) bombardearon sus antenas televisivas, pero aún asi,
no lograron cortar su trasmisión. Hesbollah había previsto esto y fue por ello
que mantenía en secreto líneas alternativas de trasmisión que Israel no pudo
detectar. Aquello supuso un factor de peso que afecto políticamente a la imagen
pública del estado que terminó en una derrota militar y consecutivamente tras
el “Informe Winograd” con el gobierno de Ehud Olmert y de todo su estado mayor.
El bombardeo deliberado contra una cadena de
televisión o un medio de prensa es un crimen de guerra, así lo dispone la Corte
Penal Internacional. Pese a ello, Israel durante años ha herido y matado a
muchos periodistas (especialmente en 2018 en el marco de las Marchas del
Retorno) por lo que, el ataque al edificio “Al Shuruk” solo es un capitulo más
en esta larga lista de crímenes. Agregado a eso, la muerte de civiles en esta
acción sería por demás suficiente para generar una masiva condena desde los
gobiernos y organizaciones en Occidente. Entonces ¿Por qué hay tanto prurito
por condenar mediáticamente y llevar a los responsables políticos israelíes a
la instancia internacional? Obviamente, es debido a las influencias políticas
pero mucho màs a las financieras que otra cosa. Incluso ello se vió de forma
escandalosa en la OEA, un organismo regional que obviando todos estos hechos y
los tiempos en que se desarrollaron, se avocó a declarar a “Hamas como una
organización terrorista”.
Cuando el edificio colapsó y mato a varios de sus ocupantes
entre ellos mujeres y niños, toda el ala de la resistencia palestina que
incluye a “Hamas”, “Jihad Islámica”, “Ezzledin Al Qassam” (brazo armado de
Hamas) acordó de forma inmediata una respuesta total contra Israel y así fue
que se lanzaron de forma intermitente y desde varias direcciones, andanadas de
cohetes caseros y muchos otros de fabricación militar ingresados de
contrabando. Por el contrario, la ANP dejando en evidencia su mero papel
decorativo, apoyo a las fuerzas israelíes para reprimir las manifestaciones callejeras
en Cizjordania.
La sorpresa fue que esos cohetes podían llegar a Tel
Aviv y a varios puntos estratégicos militares (incluido el Complejo nuclear de
Bersheba). Allí Tel Aviv y sus personeros entendieron que las cosas podían salirse
de control y comenzaron a bombardear sin piedad -como castigo colectivo- a
la Franja de Gaza como una forma de intimidar a los palestinos. Por el
contrario, ello tuvo un efecto adverso.
Pero no solo los cohetes de la resistencia palestina
hicieron temblar el suelo a los sionistas. El llamado que acompaño a la campaña
de retaliación de la resistencia hizo que se levantaran los pobladores “árabes-israelies”
de las localidades del interior quienes son los descendientes de las familias palestinas
que fueron desplazadas tras la implantación del estado judío en 1948 y por ese
motivo son tratados como ciudadanos de segunda. Aquí se vio como los servicios
de inteligencia israelíes fallaron en prever que podría suceder lo que se
estaba viendo en las ciudades donde hay una mayoría de árabes y que desde hace
décadas se hallan controladas por las fuerzas de ocupación. Los jóvenes
palestinos tomaron las calles y enfrentaron a las fuerzas represivas y a los
grupos de colonos armados llevando a que varias de estas localidades quedaran
fuera del control de Tel Aviv.
A pesar de que Israel lanzo 700 toneladas de
explosivos sobre Gaza, los palestinos no se doblegan al terror y mucho menos
abandonan sus derechos a recobrar los territorios arrebatados por un estado
colonialista.
------------------
“STROLLING BACK”
What has created
the current instability in Ireland? Is it possible to return to times of
violence?
By Sir Charlattam
Just a few days ago an old comrade from the IRA
who was observing the riots mounted by guys from Sinn Fein and other
pro-British extremist groups in Belfast, only managed to tell me "we are
going backwards again." His voice sounded dismayed, something that shocked
me since an old comrade that we will call "O'maley" is a tough guy
who passed them and very raw when the English captured him when he was trying
to enter weapons for the resistance.
And it is that what happened
on Thursday April 9 and extended without pause these days does not seem
something that is very elaborate, although I could be wrong. The problem seems
to be due to the crazy policies being implemented by the ineffable British
Prime Minister Boris Johnson who, due to the zigzagging maneuvers that he
performs in his politics, resembles that of a drunkard like “Boris Yeltsin”.
Apparently, the fights of the Protestant unionists go through the announcements
that are registered in the BREXIT that could leave them out of the ambitious
plans of a “Great Britain” with ambitions to recover the old imperial glories.
But it is also true that
this could have its origin in the endless months of confinement and the double
standard in the evaluations of who if and who cannot circulate on public roads
and the paradoxical measures of distancing that are making people mentally ill.
Also in a deep sense of uncertainty among young people who, frightened by the
rumors of a possible abandonment of London, believe all is lost if they cut the
bridge that was built after the agreement between Catholics and Protestants.
If London decides to leave
Ireland behind to fend for itself, there will be a sector that will fervently
applaud that decision and another led by the Protestant “unionists” that could
start a revolt that would take the country to the old days that nobody wants to
return. but that would be irremediable.
Irish Protestants' sense of
belonging to the UK seems feverish and they would do anything to stick with the
big island. But for Catholics self-determination without having to depend on
English interference as the Ulster Unionists wanted it is the final victory in
a long struggle for independence from such a bitter history of blood and tears.
The old problems of abuses
by British landowners, having to swear allegiance to the hated British crown
and religious tensions over the tithe were later overcome by the cold war and
the new problems of globalization. Do not forget how the IRA suffered a
division back in 1969 when its objectives were influenced more than by Marxism
by the Catholic status of its militants. Despite having obtained arms support
from the Soviet Union in 1972, they came to a ceasefire with London unleashing
a fight between various Irish factions.
The importance of the IRA as
an armed wing of the political demands of Sinn Fein was a concern that
transcended borders and even led the US administration of Ronald Reagan to get
first-hand knowledge of what was happening. The US State Department and of
course the CIA expressed their concern about the progress that Irish
nationalism could gain with Soviet aid and create a gap in Western defense. It
was thus that the then Vice President George H. Bush, who had been head of the
CIA, traveled to Ireland not only to learn about this but also mobilized by the
danger of Soviet penetration on the Island since the independence movement had
received shipments of Soviet weapons. that would make life miserable for the
British. The cooperation between MI-5, MI-6 and the CIA to establish a strategy
and the implementation of dirty war tactics (such as death squads, false
attacks and assassinations) against the IRA was undoubtedly active and the
consequences of it they were suffered by the Irish.
In reality, the war against
British rule never ceased, it only had a few temporary ceasefires, but in
reality the Irish Republicans never abandoned their objectives. From an
external perspective, the IRA was a rotten splinter in the heart of the British
Empire or rather what was left of it after the end of the Great World War. Even
its value as a tactical and strategic element did not seem to be taken into
account by other enemies of the United Kingdom.
One of the most emblematic
perhaps is the Argentine nationalists who had time and the opportunity to have
been able to establish contacts and relationships with Sinn Fein or even with
the IRA itself, especially at a time when the archipelago of islands in the
Atlantic was recovered. south back in 1982. There are many points of agreement
between Argentine and Irish nationalists that the current rulers hide under the
rug of history. Both have roots of fighting against the British with a goal of
regaining appropriate sovereignty by the Crown. There is also a root of mixture
of Irish blood with Argentine that shed its blood to defend Argentina. Who can
forget William Brown better known as Admiral Guillermo Brown, founder of the
Argentine Navy?
From a diplomatic point of
view, it may have been prudent, but from a political and practical point of
view, a waste of opportunity that these sectors and especially the military
could take advantage of.
For the Irish this
cooperation could have borne fruit in a positive way and broadened their
expectations of political scope in their demands. The Argentines would also have
obtained a good advantage to operate in the North Atlantic. But undoubtedly the
doubts or rather the objections of such contact came from the same liberal
elite of the La Plata River that is known, is permeated by an Anglophism that
comes from colonial times and is even reflected in their activities. such as
the publications of newspapers in English (closely linked to the MI-6 sources)
and a strong penetration in the social relations of the embassy with social
issues in the capital's neighborhoods and even in many provinces of the
country. Perhaps the only one with a strategic and audacious vision has been
Admiral of the Argentine Navy Jorge Isaack Anaya who in 1982 planned together
with a fraction of the “Montoneros” an ambitious move called “Operation
Algeciras” to be carried out on the Rock of Gibraltar. which had been executed
could have confused and delayed the British.
In that sense, the military
leadership, ideologically aligned with the liberalism of this local elite and
praetorian loyal to the Pentagon, would never cross their mind to have to play
that way since, in addition to the commitments they had with the US State
Department, the Pentagon and the CIA to combat subversion in the region, within
their deepest conviction these generals (with very little intelligence and
practical flexibility) sympathized with the order and Anglo-Saxon ways that
ended up being a booby-hunting trap that, in addition to making them losing a
war would take power away from them and facilitate the subsequent disarmament
of their Armed Forces. It was this stupid belief that showed them how
Washington could elbow out what they had signed with their hand at TIAR pact.
If the Catholic nationalist
sectors or the Argentine Marxists (which I doubt exist) had had a broader and
less romantic vision of what it meant to fight against an imperialist enemy,
they would have seriously considered establishing relations with the Catholics
of Sinn Fein and from the IRA, something interesting would have happened. The
truth is that those times were not the current ones and informational knowledge
was highly conditioned by the monopoly of the Anglo-Saxon media, especially by
the tabloid shows that helped to dirty causes such as that of the Irish.
-----------------------------
“WONDERFUL MOMENT FOR A PICKNICK”
Why is the crisis in Argentina a cause for celebration
and an opportunity for London and at the same time a concern for Buenos Aires?
By Sir
Charlattam
One more morning in hectic
London, a typical English gentleman in black glasses and his expensive brown
leather briefcase hurries across Westminster Bridge, hurries to Lamberth North
Station where a friend he has not seen for a long time is waiting. That
gentleman was me who was looking forward to the joy of an encounter with
someone you haven't seen for a long time and who also always brings surprises
up his sleeves. An old comrade from the Gulf and Cold War times, who played an
important role in MI-6 spy operations in South America, especially Argentina.
As always, a joy
and an emotions. Like two old foxes in the wild fields, walking is one of the
best incentives that makes us feel young and on the run so, before taking the
subway, we walked to the Military Museum a few blocks from here. Although the
air routes to and from those places are reduced, he tells me that they are not
cut off for certain people and purposes. There are still flights and especially
the private ones and the military can go without problems to Brasilia, Ezeiza
Buenos Aires or directly to Ascension Island and Mounth Pleasant in the
Falklands Islands. If you are on the payroll, there are no barriers for you,
remind me.
Things are
moving a lot in those places, he tells me. I believe that there has never been
such a valuable opportunity for the Foreign Office as the current situation.
The pandemic has a devastating effect, even for Britain, but we will survive.
On the other hand, there everything is uncertain and without a doubt it is the
best moment to remove the anti-British scum that seems to perch in the region.
Argentina seems to be exploding into pieces and I believe that this can be a reality
in a short time. That made me ask him “Do you believe it?” To which he
responded with his typical hooligan smile, “Oh yeah! You just have to push them
a little so that the house of cards that is their government collapses”.
The rumors that
have spread a few days ago about a possible coup against Fernández are a half
truth. The armed forces do not have the minimum mobilization capacity that is a
fact. His Armada, which once concerned “WhiteHall” (MOD) no longer exists. What
does exist and the media and the local political class do not want to finish
digesting it is the existence of para-state and private actors who have long
been embarked on a company as old as it is lucrative as the mercenary world is.
It is clear that
government representatives are deceiving the population and in reality they
have many reasons for it. They are entering a financial and economic abyss that
can swallow up the few sources of employment that still persist and take away
the weak institutional stability they still have. Certainly there is discomfort
in the cadres of the skilled Armed Forces and how not to have it; old weapons
that explode due to lack of maintenance, planes that fly them means a one-way
ticket to hell and the lack of strategic objectives has sapped morale. Oh certainly
there is discomfort but they have no chance to prevail as they would have
previously.
In addition,
since 1983 the threads of the Argentine defense (and this implies everything
military) are pulled from here, and it was only a couple of years ago that some
in Argentina have been aware of it. But as soon as the issue began to gather
interest in the media and the terms of the Madrid Agreements of 1989 and 1990
were exposed, "someone" picked up the phone from here or perhaps from
Washington to silence everything. And you have seen it. No one has said a
single word overnight.
Since then the
Foreign Office has been strengthening its projections about the country and has
also managed to establish very good ties in all the key sectors that are part
of the state. Not only with those idiots who invoke Churchill's sayings as if
they were passages from the Bible or those who are part of the Anglophile
society of the capital. Important hitches are where even they don't suspect.
That is why they know that there will be no bustle without a telephone ringing
in the chief director's office, much less blood reaching the river without
Washington and Beijing interfering.
While the
government of Alberto Fernández strives to try to fulfill the order agreed with
his vice, who wears a “Wanted” poster around his neck, the observers and
contacts who operate there have been reporting that the authority and its power
of control decrease with speed. Some have even sent me their intrigues talking
about the showy clumsiness or perhaps cunning of Cristina Fernández and her
supporters who try to mutate in a time of accelerated political changes, going
from showing themselves as those picturesque leftist revolutionaries in the
“Castroist” style to phlegmatic centrists and warning that times are getting
pragmatically tough trying to fabricate a right wing.
As a real
problem “Fernández & Fernández” are not of importance. They are not even a
problem. Washington and the State Department are sure of it. It is even rumored
that Mrs. Cristina's days are numbered since the Treasury Department and
obviously the State Department wants her to return the millions that I embezzle
from the accounts for laundering that her boys from the “Agency” have in the
paradise of Seychelles. Some even suggest that some of their loyalists will
deliver it on a platter when the time is right.
There is nothing
more delicious for an Argentine politician than the taste of bribery and much
more those that are offered in foreign currencies much more so. In the current
circumstances, I can assure you that fortunes are not needed to pay for pimps
and information sources within the government. There is a country given away
and I can assure you that with a few thousand pounds, you would buy your own
country. What's more, if you stop there to listen to offers, maybe you can buy
it with its inhabitants. The cumulative effect of that corruption is already an
obvious reality and you can see it in what is happening throughout Patagonia.
While the regional governments do not have the slightest idea of how to
combat the increase in insurrectionary violence of the indigenous “Mapuches”
groups, the central government shows once again that it does not have the
tools, much less a doctrine or intelligence, to confront those groups that are
financed from abroad.
It is not news
to us that there are private security entrepreneurs from here, Israel and the
United States are trying to create a market in Patagonia offering their
security services against the threats of indigenous groups that burn their
houses and attack to the authorities. What the unwary who contract with them
don't know is that these groups are trained by intelligence and military
advisers who have set up camps there that are discreet enough to go unnoticed
by satellites.
I can even
assure you that most of the population to the north, much less those of the
capital, are aware of what is happening there.
Is the Foreign
Office behind it? I asked him and he said with another question: “Only they are
involved?” There I understood his hint making it clear to me that something is
cooking in those places and the danger to its inhabitants is true.
----------------------------
“SILENCE THE ICC”
The decision of the International Criminal Court ICC to
investigate war crimes and crimes against humanity in the United States has
sparked scandalous reactions at the White House
By Sir
Charlattam
Entering the brink in the
spring, the days in Washington stretch and the sun begins to warm the faces in
the morning. Everyone seems to have forgotten about the Coronavirus and people
go about their lives with the usual normality, but there is still that air of
disenchantment and boredom in the people who settled after the murder of George
Floyd “Where will we go? And for the worse, we have thugs in the State Department
who no longer hesitate to publicly threaten those who are willing to prosecute
international crimes, "said my old friend “John” who for years worked as a
liaison for the MI-6 in Washington (D.C).
The United
States has lost its way and this is not new. It's been a long time ago. When
politicians allowed themselves to be sponsored by companies and mega-business
corporations as lucrative as they are dirty, they have sold their souls and the
very democracy of the Union. At some point these sectors of private business
took over the public affairs of the federal state and for the worse, despite
the terrible consequences that we have seen for our image around the world,
they continue to be the singing voice.
For almost 30
years, the US has used and abused empty rhetorics believing that it could
deceive everyone. Lecture the world on respect for the law and rights when we
have high-level mafias such as the Clintons eliminating witnesses to their
corruptions or the Bushes and their gang of criminals (Cheney, Rumsfeld,
Wolfowitz, Perle etcetc) linked to the oil business and war is a moral
inconsistency. Massacre of civilians in exotic and distant countries seemed a
guarantee of anonymity for their executors. Also, who would ask about those
bastards? These governments of psychopaths, in addition to death and tragedy in
civilian populations, have created thousands of psychopaths and mentally
unbalanced people who enjoy this. Where will the US go with this heavy burden?
In
addition, the press would cover everything with intoxicated stories to
manipulate opinion and justify the unjustifiable. Who would dare criticize The
White House when they were on a patriotic crusade against the bad guys? That
was yesterday. Today the truth of that lie elaborated by the war party is
known.
Perhaps at first
nobody would realize what we were doing or at least, we trusted that our
secrets would be buried in the files of government agencies with the Topsecreto
stamp up to 50 years after they were made. But it changed a lot. I don't know
if it was because the secret of those secrets failed or there were leaks, or if
the Americans in their arrogance became too careless to understand what they
were doing.
Think for a
moment. What the hell do you think a group of US Marines was going through the
head after entering a village in the mountains of northwestern Afghanistan,
they gunned down those who crossed their path and tortured unsuspecting
survivors of what no one saw them? Or, of those damn motherfuckers in Iraq from
the Army Intelligence Battalions and their civilian CIA colleagues who tortured
and played with prisoners (men and women) in pain chambers like the ones the
KGB had in Stalin's days or the SS in times of the Third Reich.
Politicians and
bureaucrats living in its shadow believe that people have forgotten that, but
what happened here just a week ago makes it clear that people do not forget and
that they can come back for you at any time. Look but what is happening in
London, where anti-racist street protests have become increasingly fierce and
have tried to be exploited by MI-5 by recruiting thugs in the suburbs and
organizing neo-Nazi shock groups to beat up protesters. Nothing has changed in
the mind of the established power.
Who can be moved
by the damage to the Churchill statues when we know what he did in Asia and
India? People know it and the worst thing about it is that although our
education systems tried to make up the faces of guys like this, in the end the
truth has come out. That is why London not only does not share Trump's threats
against the International Criminal Court but has also expressed its support for
the international body. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab was clear about this and
defended the right of the Court to be able to carry out its work without
interference.
The Foreign
Office was already regretting the support it gave the United States in its past
interventionist adventures that have compromised the credibility of the United
Kingdom with testimonies that have been documented as the “Chilcot report” that
demonstrated complicity in foul play and lies from the Anthony Blair
administration to argue the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq.
What has
happened in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Libya can no longer be hidden, and
proof of this is the pressure to begin criminal investigations into war crimes
and crimes against humanity committed by the NATO "ISAF" and those
committed by the Americans also compromising the British themselves.
Since the
beginning of the year, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has been
insisting on the requests for prosecution against high-ranking US military and
intelligence for war crimes and against humanity in Afghanistan. And so he did
authorizing the investigations last March month. It was a triumph for justice,
as the Prosecutor of the Court Fatou Bensouda exclaimed, who declared: “Today
is an important day for international criminal justice”, making it clear that “it
will undertake a wide and diligent investigation.” Obviously, both, the State
Department, the Defense Department and the White House itself ignored those
requests and soon counterattacked.
So with
overlapping maneuvers and trying to intimidate the prosecutor, they immediately
tried to intimidate her with possible consequences if she continued. Mike
Pompeo himself announced two weeks ago launching all kinds of insults the
revocation of the visa for the officials of the International Criminal Court (ICC)
and suggesting other additional sanctions such as those ordered in the last
hours by Trump's executive order.
What kind of democracy do these blackmail and
gangster attitudes? But the character of the African lawyer seems firm and
attached to neutrality and committed to moving forward not only in this case
but also with the atrocities committed by Israel, a very close partner in dirty
intelligence affairs. She makes a big difference from the previous prosecutor
who was clearly scandalously functional in Washington and Brussels.
To add to the
arbitrariness, you have to listen to the press talk about "alleged"
crimes, demonstrating that caution with the Establishment that they never had
to accuse other countries of the worst things.
But guys like
Pompeo and Esper are not worried about this incident being aired in an international
instance like the ICC, one more in a mountain of crimes. What frightens these
bureaucrats with committed ideological interests is that from deep inquiries,
more scandals like those of Abu-Graib in Iraq or the deplorable and
embarrassing Guantánamo on the island of Cuba would emerge. Imagine if the
investigations were deepened? Many dirty things would come to light and would
be left in the myth. Hopefully, the officials of the International Criminal
Court will not give in to the blackmail and pressure from Washington.
--------------------
“LONDON STRIKE IN”
What really happened on the London Bridge? Many points
of the episode leave doubts about the real motivation of the attacker. Is it
perhaps a false flag to annoy the projects of the candidate Jeremy Corbyn?
By Dany Smith
The scenario could not be better. As a repeated movie,
the shooting of you come on the "London Bridge" helped to relive the
fear of Islamist terrorism that the Anglo-Saxon media installed since 2001 and
that so many geopolitical benefits have given Britain, the United States and of
course, Israel . But once again, something is not clear in this episode. According
to the chronicle of passersby, a man armed with a knife and dressed in a vest
with fake explosives, stab him at several passersby who passed by.
Eyewitnesses
alleged that after the attack, several men were able to reduce it and subdue it
on the ground, being stunned by the blows they gave it. An amateur video taken
from a high section of the bridge can graph part of what happened and where the
attacker can be seen surrounded by several men struggling with him lying on the
ground. A few seconds later, a guy is observed with a knife in his hand that
moves away from the group looking where the attacker was while two policemen
with semi-automatic rifles shoot him in cold blood. What the hell was what happened?
Although it
seems a fact of the so-called "lonely wolves", it was rather a
macabre situation that sought a clear goal: Sow fear in British society and
reinstate distrust of immigrants of Arab and Muslim origin. This has aroused
numerous suspicions and questions that clearly do not want to be answered and much
less answered by the British authorities, much less by those conducted by a
Zionist jester like Boris Johnson.
Several things
are not clear and this leads us to suspect with great certainty that we are
facing another dirty operation mounted by the services of the “MI-5” of the
so-called “False Flag” that tries to involve as responsible those who have really
not been responsible done nothing. Clearly there is an attacker named Usman
Khan, 28, who had been detained and who despite being in electronic wrist
watch, was able to mount this fact without problems. All too convenient Do not
you think? In this sense, it should not be surprising that in the coming weeks
the Foreign Office will present an intelligence report that reveals an Islamic
suspect or with a similar connection.
The first
question to ask ourselves is why would a terrorist wear a fake explosive vest?
A true attacker "Yahid" would not have done this nonsense.
Some might
be suspecting that it was the work of a madman or that it was a mission
destined to test the social reaction to a symbolic threat that although it was
armed with a knife, it showed the unsuspecting passerby, explosives that in
sight seemed real but in reality they were props. As it turned out, the
experiment was a success as it caused the reaction of panic and street dismay.
Now we have to wait if it generates the second effect that would be, the
benefit to a certain political sector of the country.
The second
question would be: If the occasional passers-by despite being armed with a
knife managed to reduce it on the ground, why did the police who arrived a few
minutes later shot them in cold blood? Perhaps the police chief and his
political bosses allege the potential explosive threat he was carrying in that
vest. Today it is known that the explosives carried by the subject were false
but, in the eyes of alleged anti-terrorist experts, it is not understood how
they could be left to panic and (after warning) massacre it on the ground when
there was no risk of an alleged explosion.
When it would
have been very useful for the investigations to take the attacker alive and
subject him to interrogation, his death closes the case and leaves open the
range of speculations that will be exploited by the neo-Zionist Johnson government
that with this act, will try to use it against the opponent Jeremy Corbyn who
has been slandered over the last month by the most recognized Zionists in
London.
It is important
to highlight this since Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn has been more than clear and
blunt in his position regarding the lack of self-criticism of the Zionists
because of the bloody and illegal policies that the state of Israel carries out
over the Palestinian population (especially against children and women) coming
to compare the government of Benjamin Netanyahu as the ISIS. This obviously
causes anger in the Tel Aviv government and British Zionist circles.
The third
question that arises is: Who is the guy who after having been in the tumult
that reduced this attacker, took the knife with which he had attacked
passersby? You also have to ask yourself: How did the police allow that guy to
walk away and take the crime weapon with him? The latter is as serious and
inexplicable as all of the above, but this, curiously and conveniently, will
prevent fingerprints and the precise identification of the weapon with which
the attack was carried out.
The last issue
is linked to the situation in which the attacker's body is left. Lying in the
middle of the pedestrian bridge and without the area having been isolated by
the police so that the forensic body could gather clues, a stranger appears and
with total calmness and unmoved he leans over it and with a professional camera
he takes several photographs. Are you a forensic police photographer? I do not
think so. He is not identified as such, much less dressed in the protocol suit
required to investigate a crime scene. May be an element of MI-15 or MI-16?
Certainly, these
issues suggest something very murky and that it has nothing to do with what
both the Boris Johnson government and the media wanted to appear.
The circumstances
in which this occurs remind us of other similar and traumatic episodes that
were exploited by conservatives and their Zionist allies of parliament (and
using the Mass Media) in order to condition voters in the vicinity of elections
that could cause many problems if he won the opposition. No one here escapes
that with these terrorist attacks like the one in Manchester in 2017 at the
“Arena” stadium, conservatives have benefited very conveniently. And as on that
occasion, here we are also close to general elections that can enshrine the
victory of a very nasty guy like Jeremy Corbin, who among other issues has put
the Palestinian situation and the illegal settlements of settlers on land as a
topic on his agenda Arabs what is not little for the powerful interests that
move behind all this.
--------------------------------------
“INSTITUTIONALITY DOUBTFUL”
When propaganda does not match the facts of reality
By Sir
Charlattam
What could be done to hide
something so bad? This is an indiscreet question that has been ringing through
the halls of the House of Commons and in the streets of the Westminster. The
reference of the question points to the decisions of the brand-new Prime
Minister Boris Johnson who apparently would be willing to make the exit of the
European Union without further waiting. But the fabulous promises that BREXIT
would bring seem to be just that and the economic and commercial reality of the
European bloc seems to inform that this could never be realized.
In the last
hours it was learned that Prime Minister Johnson has requested to suspend the
sessions of parliament, "nothing less", so that they cannot address
the issue of BREXIT. As a source present at a meeting between Jeremy Corbin and
his deputies said, their faces were transfigured upon hearing Johnson's plan.
This maneuver of the British premier amazes in light of the repeated propaganda
of the democratic system of the constitutional monarchy of the islands.
Well, welcome to
reality. The British system is as corrupt and weak as any underdeveloped
African and Latin American country that for years its politicians criticized by
giving sermons of civility and political freedom. Foolishness! Pure media trash,
nothing more. Boris Johnson has put his signature on this and the worst of it
is that it has just begun.
Of course, many
of the citizens of the world fail to understand what the superiority of this
squalid monarchy can be without equal to a republic in other parts of the
world. It has been proven that the ancient is not always the best that is,
based on the qualification of the "oldest democracy in the world."
The problem of the British or rather of their politicians, descendants a
lineage of pirates and overseas criminals who made their fortunes with the
robbery to become the respectable Lords of the empire, have not been able to
understand that the world has long since changed.
As is the case
with underdeveloped countries and in the particular case of Argentina, the
English as individuals are part of a nation with their own history and with
political parties that supposedly have different ideologies that form a long
and distinguished institutionality and that at the same time respond to a royal
Crown, in the end they don't want to take responsibility for the choice they
make. A character like Boris Johnson did not arrive alone and knocked on the
door of Downing Street 10 to enter and say "Hey, did anyone ask for a
Prime Minister?"
There were signs
in the air and on his face that announced what this guy could get to realize
what now seems a surprise. Already by mid-August he had stated that "he
will do everything possible to slam the EU before October 31", clearly
without caring about the consequences. So now many Britons are wondering who
placed this lunatic in the government?
They are the
same English who chose him, now they seem to be surprised at the first
resolutions of their ruler. The last of its decisions that has caused great
concerns refers to the proposal made to “Her Majesty” the queen to suspend the
sessions of the parliament to be able to define the issue of Britain's
departure from the European Union at her own discretion. Johnson's decision is
far from what any autocrat or dictator of the unstable failed African or Middle
Eastern states would take.
Criticism was
not long in coming and it was so that Irish Prime Minister Michael D'Arcy came
out to compare the British Prime Minister with the legendary and very hated by
the way Oliver Cromwell who among other things invaded and looted Ireland in
1649. The comparison aims to describe a past tyrant brutal and undemocratic
that today would be reflected in the comic figure of Johnson who intends to
introduce the United Kingdom in a BREXIT process without due deliberation of
all its members.
Nor did the
Scottish Prime Minister Nicola Sturgeon remain silent, who bluntly and semantic
euphemisms called his British counterpart as a "dictator." John Mc
Dowell went a little further and also described him as a "clown"
forgetting maybe there are terror clowns.
The US media
have been a little more benevolent and have described the situation created by
Johnson as similar to what Donald Trump is facing at home.
But Johnson's
maneuver is far from being that of an idiot. He knows what happened to Teresa
May when he tried to impose the BREXIT before the House of Commons and that is
why, if he wants a quick success, he must directly cut the snake's head. It is
an old and well-known ruse among British parliamentarians.
Johnson's
proposal would begin to take effect on September 11 (what a date!) avoiding
parliamentary voting and thereby sabotaging the deliberation required by a
democratic system. It is a way by which Johnson if he manages to suspend the
parliament will be able to do his will and that of the interests that he
represents in the subject of his interest and if he does not succeed, he will
obtain a vote or motion of censure by the parliamentarians who will expel him
from the position. Either option will let the elusive political conservative
fall.
------------------------------
"HELLO, CALLING BORIS"
Who can predict what is in the head and what the next
British prime minister will do
By Sir
Charlattam
I must confess that I was not
surprised at all by the triumph of this exponent of the British conservatism
veined by the ubiquitous Zionism that currently finances everything in Western
and British politics, without a doubt. Boris Johnson has done his job very well
and as the jester of the City's financial banking sectors has not disappointed
in his contributions to contribute to the new strategy of controlled global
chaos.
For my friends
in South America in particular from Argentina, Boris is represented as a
right-wing “populist” similar to the White House cowboy who comes to close the
borders of his country and let immigrants from countries that his own country
has destroyed with their collaborations with the US, they drown in the
Mediterranean or in the English Channel. For others who like to kiss the feet
of British representatives on duty at the Buenos Aires embassy, Johnson is an
admirable politician who, with his gesture in May 2018 at the Monument to the
Fallen in the Falklands War in 1982, seems to have bewitched by the false
belief that he would release the bond that London maintains over that
domination.
A simple cartoon
that although nice is not the reality of what it represents.
Know your
opponent well and then think about it, I would say my old and remembered chief
of operations at the Ministry of Intelligence six before throwing his tongues
in the air. Johnson is not just any lunatic, much less the clown that many have
described with cartoons across the EU. At some point he was a journalist with a
deranged diet as much as his personal life.
That helped him to rise to fame and
make known to the public what in turn served to become mayor of London and
later a supporter of leaving the Brexit created by Nigel Farage through an
agreement with the European Union.
But Johnson
faithful to the principles of a British politician knows how to undo what he
said a few moments before and present it as something he had never really said.
This is how he once held Teresa May and when he saw that the waves of an
untimely exit from the Union could cause a political, commercial and financial
cataclysm became a moderate. That word sounds very funny in a damn racist who
applauds the massacres in Palestine and goes to Tel Aviv and then goes to kiss
the Wailing Wall.
The same racist
Islamophobe who has justified the foreign intervention in Syria with the
repeated arguments of his predecessors of the Cameron administration and of
course a sickly Russophobe who tried boldly to accuse Russia of the most
unlikely stupidities.
In this sense
the contradictions of this chubby cheater have caused some reactions that
affect the constitution of his next administration. The position that he now embraces
to continue with the Brexit process as it gives rise and even at the cost of
destroying Britain's international commercial network, has frightened the
capitalists and their politicians in Parliament. It is that conservative
constellation characters as dissimilar as Philip Hammond and Rory Stewart have
been horrified by Johnson's insane statements and have already announced that
they are not interested in taking up any position in Johnson's administration. David
Lidigton's abrupt departure was a warning.
Already some
British and non-British have begun to fear that the next tenant of Dawning
Street 10 is a delusional and megalomaniac with eccentric ideas like the one
occupied by the White House, which has already begun to cause comments and
speculation in the General Headquarters of the NATO in Brussels.
I recommend that
nobody hurry with their conclusions and for certain the signs and sayings of
this supposed fair clown. Do not make mistakes and make evaluations based on
superficial appearances.
------------------------------
"MAY AND ITS CONDITIONS"
How the G20 summit in Osaka was the stage for Teresa
May's last move trying to get Russia involved in the Skripal issue
By Sir
Charlattam
 |
| May Stone face |
The world has irremediably changed and all the
questions that were previously buried in mounds of lies and governmental
censures today have been irremissibly present to the public opinion making
everything that a government or governments present, be analyzed with tweezers.
Nobody or any government at present escapes this rule. This is what also applies
to the British who for centuries have been the masters of the lie, but, as we
have said, times change for everyone.
When the former
Russian agent Skripal and his daughter Yulia appeared unconscious on a bench in
a public square in Salisbury with signs of poisoning, the government of Teresa
May without hesitation (and without the evidence of the case) accused Moscow of
having perpetrated a chemical attack on British soil, being the perfect excuse
to seek to deepen the battery of sanctions that were being implemented from
Washington. At this Vladimir Putin sketched a grin on his face and meditated
his response.
The only
presumably intervening Russian element was the chemical element used, although
it was later determined that it was not such though "Downing Street
10" and the media insisted on it. Similarly, London has prosecuted two
Russian citizens (two scapegoats) scapegoat to be the executors of the attack.
Of course the
British version of the story was going to comment for whom Skripal had worked
in the past and for whom he was working lately. A former Russian agent in
Britain is not on free vacations and without paying for the condition he had.
As a double agent, to say that he was retired is a fallacy. As a friend who
used to work for His Majesty's secret service used to tell me, "never get
out of this." A double agent not only works for two or several agencies at
the same time but also tends to annoy some or some of them for the benefit of
another; and that was the case with Skripal. In that sense, why is MI-6 going
to be left out of suspicion if one of its double agents no longer gave benefits
or had repented and returns to work with the enemy?
If someone
thinks that the British and in particular their intelligence services like the
outside MI-6 do not play dirty and are not as ruthless as their Russian
colleagues, you live in a fairy world. The only difference is the bad press of
one media cover for the other.
Despite the
accusation, no other convincing elements were found to support the arguments of
May's cabinet and the Foreign Office's schemers, who are interested in
involving Russia. Something failed in the armed narrative. The announcement by
the prime minister about this supposed attack was not enough and the immediate
political and diplomatic retort of the Vladimir Putin government disarmed the
expectations of the rancid conservative sectors led by Boris Johnson, very
interested in creating an international incident that, interestingly enough,
was ringing finger to the American neoconservatives and Zionists.
Likewise, the
government of Teresa May ordered the expulsion of more than twenty Russian
officials from Great Britain, something that received due Russian reciprocity
with the expulsion of the British consular members in Moscow.
Do not forget
the framework in which this incident occurred, characterized by Trump's
accusations against Bashar Al Assad of punishing him for the alleged use of
chemical weapons (never proven) and by the fury of the neo-conservatives in the
face of the success of Russian troops in defeat the terrorist groups (including
the Daesh) that ravaged Syria. Putin not only ruined the strategy that together
with the United States had deployed in the Middle East but left those in
ridicule before the world.
In the current
framework of the G-20 Summit held in Osaka Japan, Teresa May as
"interim" prime minister and with the days left to leave the office
after shaking a cold handshake with her Russian counterpart, had an approach to
Vladimir Putin proposing the resumption of bilateral relations interrupted by
the "Skripal" affair but, under conditions set by London. These
conditions refer to alleged influences and actions that Russia rejects outright.
It was a
misleading and malicious proposal in which, before leaving, he tries to extract
truth lies with a maneuver based on a fallacious premise. If Moscow agrees to
such a proposal it would recognize that something had to do with that matter
and if it denies it, it would show its lack of intention to amend its supposed
lack; clearly, a high-level diplomatic lie.
There is a clear
racial hostility in the British positions that continually mix disqualifying
adjectives and political positions to refer to "Russia" or "the
Russians". This was revealed recently in Osaka as stated by the spokesman
for May's cabinet when he said "the broadest pattern of malignant behavior
in Russia is well known". When you have heard these positions that clearly
do not distinguish liberals and conservatives, this refers to a disease that
has rebounded after the end of the cold war and that is in Britain, the US and
some European countries called "Rusophobia."
-----------------------------
“UNCERTAIN PERSPECTIVES”
The announcement of the presidential formula
"Fernandez and Fernandez" has begun a controversy within the same
Peronism; Unit or a new fracture?
By Sir Charlattam
In a country like Argentina,
nothing is predictable and nobody can calculate in the medium term what is
really going to happen if one or another governing formula wins. It is an
intrinsic question of its idiosyncrasy that is verified throughout its history.
When everything suits, everyone gets caught in the train of conveniences and
when everything is over, nobody knows what happened. Undoubtedly it is a
country with too many contradictory and contradictory contrasts that do not
pass precisely because of cultural, religious or ethnic differences as they
happen in other parts of the globe.
Moreover, it is
necessary to separate carefully those who, from the political apparatuses,
arrogate to themselves the representation of citizenship, of the inhabitants
who allow themselves to be represented by a caste that has already come and
gone as far as corruption is concerned. Equally, it is not possible to
relinquish responsibility to this same population, which is an integral part of
the theory of the states. Without a population there would be no need for a
representation and in that way there would only be an empty territory. In the
Argentine case, there is a clear syncretism between the partisan political
referents and their representatives who for quite some time became an obscene
and toxic conspiracy that between favors and dark concessions ultimately serves
to cover each other's backs.
The news of the
last hours of Saturday referring to the launch of a presidential formula
representing Peronism between Alberto Fernández and Cristina Fernández, has
aroused all kinds of comments and speculations that do not escape the interest
of the international community. The political and financial Establishment that
gave financial aid to the Macri government through the IMF would see its debts
in danger with the arrival of CFK. And it is that, although the government of
CAMBIEMOS is still in force and continues in power, its political-economic
situation is a disaster that is being capitalized by the ex-president and her lackeys,
who profile it as the only one that can bring a solution for a serious crisis
that the country is going through but can it bring a solution that has not been
able to bring a government aligned with international banking like Macri's? Definitely
not.
In this sense it would not be necessary to try to convince a part of the
Argentine population about this.
The very
constitution of the formula reveals the quality of the presidential couple.
Alberto Fernandez who after leaving her in 2008 with serious accusations and
until not long ago criticized her for her position and her errors of
government, today she is back together with the one who blames the country's
ills. For its part, CFK who condemned the exile to this "traitor",
today receives it with smiles and hugs which reveals the deceptive quality of
the candidates.
When she had the
sum of power in her hands, the president was only content with a power made up
with boring speeches remembrances past, merely visual and directed to his own
troop. At that time, the country was as weak as it is today, only with an extra
addition, the ideological stupidity of trying to destroy its own institutions
for old revenge.
Both CFK and
Macri are part of the same system of things that guarantees stability, playing
within the framework that precisely external interests direct through
investments and commercial and financial interactions. There are no differences
between one and the other, at least there are no differences in what macro
state policy does; both are puppets of the same Anglo-Saxon puppeteers and are
subject to the surrender treaties of a country delivered with signatures and
stamped in 1990 by the "Peronist" administration of Menem.
For the Foreign
Office its return is possible and this would bring many benefits for the
interests of Great Britain. The nature of his megalomaniac personality helped
much in the past for the conservative sectors in the parliament, to vote for
the increase of the defense budget and electronic intelligence gathering
operations of the GCHQ and of the real naval intelligence aimed at
strengthening the military garrison of the Falklands Islands. Even during his
administration, the MI-6 was able to operate, enter and leave in complete
comfort due to the absence of operational internal security.
From these
considerations and what has been seen until then, it is clear that beyond
improving the pockets of the inhabitants or giving them an extra penny that
comes out of the public coffers, the country, as an international actor, does
not it will come out of its political and economic lethargy. Forget to see some
foreign policy to recover the sovereignty of the islands occupied by Great
Britain and much less, to seriously restructure the Armed Forces. In the same
way, with the intelligence area completely bought by Tel Aviv and through its
spyware software such as Pegasus, they will continue to control Argentine
citizens at their discretion. The pantomime of improvement of the area of
defense with pots and lags useless for the current challenges will continue
its course. Both guarantee - in their own way - the absence of patriotism and
the commitment to establish a true republic based on healthy and non-partisan
institutions.
That is why the
IMF has reached the conclusion that regardless of whether Macri or CFK wins,
Argentina as a state, must return with all its interests, the disbursements
that in character of loan requested Buenos Aires in recent years. And much
worse; If CFK regains the administration of the Casa Rosada, its inhabitants
can rest assured that the economy will become much worse than it is today, as
many economic analysts are perceiving it and their government will have to
resort to coercive measures tributaries that will make see Macri and his staff,
as jester apprentices.
As regards his
foreign policy, perhaps and only perhaps a new management of CFK would be
encouraged to strengthen serious ties with Moscow and Beijing although, seeing
the background of his previous management and the preparation of his political
cadres that is very difficult to see materialized. Do not forget that CFK is a
verbal revolutionary but not of action and its ambitions are reduced to
maintaining the security of a local environment without disturbing the true
enemies of the country.
For now all this
is just speculation and nothing more. The numbers of the consultants are not
reliable since they have proven to be as contrived as the interests of their
owners. You are only looking at a balloon inflated by the media, the moment for
the careerists to hang on to a historic opportunity to seize the power of a
government without staining their hands that apparently would fall by the
weight of their own ineptitude, but nothing more.
------------------------------
"DO NOT LOSE ARGENTINA"
A friend call or call to see how things are at home?
There are concerns in Washington about the weakness that the government of Cambiemos
in Buenos Aires is suffering
By Charles H.
Slim
So we could describe what the
US State Department has concluded after analyzing the latest events and based
on studies of what happens in Argentina. Macri and his government would seem to
be on the verge of falling into disgrace, some point out. The country can fall
back into the hands of populism led by Kirchnerism and Washington does not like
the idea at all. These are not just purely economic and financial issues; There
are other issues that are much more important and decisive for the geopolitics
of the White House that move their concerns.
Donald Trump
little cares that it is Cristina Fernandez or Mauricio Macri who manages
Argentina, since he does not decide on the geopolitical and strategic long-range
issues that have already been laid out for decades in the planning developed by
the Think Tanks of the Department of State and the Pentagon. Beyond the
economic and commercial importance it represents for the investors of the City
of London and Wall Street, the Southern Cone and especially Argentina, the most
influential neoconservative sectors and the Jewish-American lobbies that
decisively influence within the Political Establishment do not they want the
return of a political sector that is associated with Venezuela and Iran. It is
not necessary to have to add that they will not sit idly by if CFK intends to
return to power; Even if you have enough support for a return, they will be
responsible for not assuming it.
On May 9 after 4
pm, hours before Cristina Fernandez presented her book Sincerely in the book fair, at times that Macri was in the
presidential residence of Olivos was warned that there was a long distance call
from Washington. The face of the Argentine president was puzzled by not apparently
understanding what was the purpose of that called. It was nothing less than his
counterpart and former business partner Donald Trump who called him to greet
him and internalize the current situation of Argentina and learn firsthand and
from the mouth of Macri himself, as seen for the upcoming elections. Although
it cannot be said that it was something strange, it was not a scheduled call or
those that qualify as official, so at least they clarified from the residence
of Olivos.
With respect to
the real reasons of Donald Trump for this call, the environment did not give
details but it is speculated that there was nothing accidental.
No need to
clarify that from the other side of the speaker and sitting around Trump were
listening carefully and perhaps taking note of the conversation their national
security advisers and possibly the same Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. There
is too much invested in the region and in Argentina to allow undesirable
sectors to throw everything away from the rail. Macri has been a very good
collaborator and an excellent intermediary with the governments of the region.
The situation in Venezuela supporting the political and diplomatic siege of the
government of Nicolás Maduro is praiseworthy and according to some of the most
"top guys" that surround Trump, he has not stayed there. Thanks to
the renewed foreign policy of Buenos Aires, there are intelligence advisors and
US troops operating in Patagonia very close to where the Chinese are and that
would never have been achieved with the corrupt of CFK.
It was said only
that the talk referred to the current situation of the country and an
expression of Trump's support for the economic reform program that his
Argentine counterpart has been carrying forward with harsh social consequences.
This call is not accidental, much more if the economic issue was addressed
because at that time a technical mission of the International Monetary Fund was
working with senior finance officials of the Argentine government trying to
determine the next outlay of about US $ 5,400 million of dollars.
In the Argentine
presidential residence the call was lived as a beneficial signal that can help
give a very good signal to investment funds that have been seriously concerned
about the fall of image and the economic setbacks that have been occurring in
the country. Perhaps it is an exaggeration or a too enthusiastic look for the
crisis that lives the country but as they say "worse is nothing".
Currently and as never before, Argentina is dependent on the decisions of
external bodies and without doubt, foreign governments such as the United
States and Britain. On this, some like Benjamin Gedan, an analyst at the
strategic analysis center "Wilson Center" concluded that beyond the
setbacks represented by the personality of the US president, in Argentina after
his last visit there were no massive demonstrations of rejection of his
presence or against The USA. With this he has tried to argue that beyond CFK
has a speech that appears "anti-imperialist", will play the game as
he did when he was president and will turn a blind eye to operations that the
Pentagon, the CIA or any other agency carry forward in the Argentine territory.
Gedan was one of
the advisors of the State Department of the Obama administration and,
therefore, an enthusiast of the interventionist foreign policy brutally carried
out in North Africa and against Syria by then Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton. Added to this, the dirty complicities of Clinton and the CIA in the
unclear issue of Bengazi in 2012 and the emails brought to light by the leaks of
former NSA agent Snowden, do not offer much light for such meetings. It seems a
contradiction that Gedan is presented as a democrat although it is not so much
since the administration for which I work, authorized more secret operations of
"preventive killings" of the CIA by using Drones on villages in
Pakistan, Afghanistan and Yemen, arriving to be more fucking bloody than his
Republican predecessor.
With this in
view, say according to Gedan that "Obama was a prominent defender of human
rights" and that proof of this received the Nobel peace prize, is a
mockery to the thousands of innocent people imprisoned, tortured and murdered
under his administration.
Macri serves as
the nice mask for the dirty tasks that the North American task forces and their
Israeli allies are preparing in the Argentine north and the entire Amazon area.
There is a huge information gap about this and nobody in Buenos Aires wants to
talk about it. To cover the backs in these matters is Jair Bolsonaro who is the
favorite puppet of the Republicans and especially the ultraconservative
interests that are hidden in the Financial Establishment that speculates that
the Brazilian government privatized the last public companies that are left to
the country .
For analysts
such as Gedan and his conservative counterparts in the current administration
of Trump, Brazil and Argentina represent a magnificent geographical trade space
to which we must capitalize and control so that it does not fall under the
control of the continuous Chinese interference to which the US president it has
declared commercial war by imposing tariffs on its products, which began to
cause consequences within its own country and even with economic and commercial
damage to the European Union. Only with friendly governments such as Macri and
Bolsonaro can they do it.
------------------------------
“KINGDOM OF FALKLANDS"
The internal convulsion that shakes Great Britain by
the Brexit could accelerate the hidden desires of the Kelper to demand a
political autonomy of the islands of the South Atlantic and to obtain the
category of an independent state Who can believe it possible?
By Sir
Charlattam
Not long ago, maybe two years
ago one of my friends, who usually travels through South America in search of
material for his written research that he then publishes in distinguished
British and European publishers, brought me a disturbing information or rather
rumors that they were running in some environments linked to British diplomacy
in the Santiago axis of Chile and Buenos Aires in over certain political
movements in one of the last overseas dominations of the British crown, nothing
more and nothing less than the islands of the South Atlantic archipelago .
Before the 1982
war, the "Falklands" islands were totally unknown to the majority of
the British, they even did not know that they had as part of the community
citizens of second or better, second-class subjects in those parts that Foreign
officials Office in London slyly christened "Kelpers". Perhaps the
bureaucrats and the officials covered by their impeccable and expensive clothes
to see the postcards of the islands that closely resemble the idyllic
landscapes of Wales and Scotland, already placed in their minds "they must
be second-degree citizens like the Welsh and the Scottish." Equally and
beyond these discriminations, the inhabitants of the islands prefer the United Kingdom
before Argentina as an assistant state or on which to back; nothing personal
until before 1982. And it is that beyond the circumstances that brought the
development of that war, the Kelpers rely more on the Anglo-Saxon
administrative idiosyncrasies than on the corrupt and inefficient Argentine
bureaucracy, part of the problem that historically afflicts them. It would be
something like a matter of understanding and nothing more. That to a certain
extent that in recent years has been limited by certain circumstances of
British politics as the international reality that encourages islanders to
claim some political autonomy or even others speaks of sovereign independence.
Can this be possible?
In Buenos Aires
nobody wanted to think about it, that is very clear and among other denials to
reality -which characterizes their mentality- they are still convinced that
they will achieve some result with the endless claims before the UN
Decolonization Committee or swallowing dirty operations of intoxication
information such as that released to public knowledge about a declassification
of the supposedly secret secret negotiations carried out - extremely
confidential - between Argentine and British representatives somewhere in
Switzerland in September 1980. This supposed document would be the preface to
the good auspices of another dubious intermediation of the CIA for Buenos Aires
and London to reach a balanced agreement on the "Malvinas" issue.
But in all these
alleged negotiations and transcended the islanders were always left out, those
despicable Patagonian sheep herders who do not know how to negotiate in the
high diplomatic spheres and little understanding of geopolitical issues.
Certainly the "Kelpers" noticed this and were weaving the idea of a
path of self-determination over time.
In London, some
of the Think Tanks that serve and contribute ideas to the Foreign Office
already visualized it. And it is that since the archipelago took strategic
importance for the deployments of NATO in the hemisphere -potentiated by the
fall of the Soviet Union- and of course for Great Britain for the resources of
fishing, mining and especially the oil that surrounds The islands, the crown
budget has sustained the forced presence (under the concept "Fortress
Falklands") even trying to promote the benefits of a remote colony in the
insular seas more than 7695 miles from London.
With a little more
than 3000 inhabitants, the islanders, a heterogeneous population composed of a
percentage of British born on the islands for several generations, British in
arms service in Mount Pleasant and many other citizens of various parts of the
poses that have temporary contracts that They can enter the islands after
meticulous analysis of intelligence information since the "Kelpers"
historically distrust the continental inhabitants -including the Chileans- even
though they have many friends there.
As expected,
they have very broadband Internet and telephony communications, very well
protected by the military branch of Cyberwar that operates from the islands.
Although the islanders feel and are well protected from imaginary Argentine
incursions, they feel the need to take their destiny in their hands and promote
self-determination for the entire archipelago. Do you think that is silly? I do
not really believe it and they are sure that in "Whitehall" and the
evil brain that works tirelessly in the "Foreign Office" they have
already asked themselves the question.
And it is that
with the arrival of the government of CAMBIEMOS in Argentina in 2015 it became
feasible to expand the operations of prospecting and study of the maritime
areas surrounding the islands and even close to the coasts of the continent
obtaining great results. Most of these businesses are private and would only
benefit private companies and ventures of Argentine government officials that
include the same president Mauricio Macri. But they know that in this deal they
are not contemplated and even they would not receive anything substantial from
the benefits for the extraction and possible transportation of crude oil to the
world market. Although for what they themselves speculate, the profits that they
also receive would be more than enough to finance the assembly of a state with
its own armed militia and even, boost an autonomous economy based on oil,
fishing and tourism.
Today, more than
ever, the possibilities are on the horizon with the "Brexit" process
and the serious problems that the mere mention of severing certain ties with
the European Union is bringing. London has too many internal problems to pay
attention to what happens to more than seven thousand miles, as long as the
concern merits attention. Keeping overseas possessions like those in the South
Atlantic represents an expense that has already been a long endless discussion
in the House of Commons that has been complemented by corruption scandals and
dark negotiations involving the Ministry of Defense and sectors private
companies in the development of new vessels for Royal Navy that have reported
serious failures in their facilities.
The enthusiasm
and the material possibilities exist, the political circumstances warrant it,
the Argentines are not a serious obstacle nor even as a possibility to be taken
into account but would London allow it? Even if Theresa May or the nationalist
ministers who come do not like the idea of losing control of a possession
like the Falklands, they will not really do it and it would only be a mere
change of status, a democratization of relations between a grateful people that
grew up Under the protection of their ancestors and of the mother country Great
Britain, who must let her children grow up and fend for themselves, do not
believe it?
“WHAT THE BREXIT HAD”
Despite the temporary transitional period to rearrange
the government and the foreign affairs of Great Britain until October 31st, the
exit of the European Union seems already a consecrated reality. The last
goodbye of Theresa May as Minister of a United Kingdom?
By Sir
Charlattam
Can anyone imagine where
Britain will go with Brexit? Nobody can answer this question at the moment and
this is because there are few Britons who care about that answer. There is a
very complex social reality in the suburbs that threatens to imitate the
"yellow vests" of Paris, but in the estates from which state affairs
are conducted, there are expectations. The question seems romantic and patriotic
to the loyal subjects of his majesty who hope to reconnect with the old glories
of the empire. Well bad news for them, there are no prospects for positive
things with this capricious separation and say very similar third-world
countries.
The drive of the
Brexit has also revived many ghosts of the past and worse, with new visions in
a world much more complicated than the twentieth century. From this point of
view, the supporters of the separation of the EU seem to ignore or perhaps
challenge the problems that the disconnection of the governmental levels of
cooperation that have a great strategic value for the subjects of state of the
United Kingdom will bring. Issues such as defense, internal and cyber security
and cooperation in the intelligence area seem to be more sensitive to the
changes that will undoubtedly occur due to the departure of London from the
European administrative scheme.
For us it is
only a smoke screen. The Foreign Office will continue to discreetly count on
the support of its German, French and also Belgian colleagues, but it will
undoubtedly delay many official coordination mechanisms that were previously
part of the EU, were available at the push of a button. With the Brexit will
come a bureaucratic business that will delay to Great Britain at the time of
the seventies and the beginning of the eighties, so much so. Apparently it is
the price that the English right-wingers are willing to bear to recover old
glories. For many other Britons it is like a leap in time that makes the TV
series of the sixties look like.
For the Crown's
forced partners, this new paradigm can generate opportunities for each one of
them. Ireland and Scotland are already gestating in their internal political
realities, new political movements seeking to shake off control of London and
its centuries-old influence that has only benefited the families and
economically influential clans of the islands. The concerns are in the air and
are of all kinds; the process of separation Brexit has unleashed comments from
the most cautious citizens to the most extreme conservative imperialism that
seem to resurrect as the "Ave Fenix". The case of the IRA in Ireland
seems exemplary. When in 1994 the leadership of the Irish Revolutionary Army
announced the ceasefire in exchange for the British demilitarization, it was
like the end of an era that was circumscribed in the disappearance of the
bipolar world that created the difficulty for the clandestine organizations of
national liberation to sustain themselves under the pressure of NATO.
Despite the
promises, the British showed no signs of wanting to release the bone and
Ireland to continue splitting in two and the quarrels followed under the skin
of every Irishman who despite wanting peace and prosperity, had to tolerate the
usual tricks Dirty London And is that the fall of the USSR,
"Whitehall" and its intelligence agencies enhanced their resources
and activities that made see Downing Street 10 and the Foreign Office that
there was no need to respect equitable agreements.
For that reason,
a new IRA has resurfaced that, despite recognizing a limitation in its
capabilities, has promised not to abandon the objectives of its founders. This
has been increased after continued British military provocations that after the
riots in Derry in the province of Ulster ended with the accidental death by a
lost shot of the journalist Lyra Mckee, which as expected will be used by the
British Parliament for recommendations of greater pressure and military
presence in the province.
With a Brexit
framework, the operation of the MI-6 could be limited or limited to operate in
the European territory without the advantages of having the network resources
of the European intelligence community. Is that credible? Well, we'll see that
with the passage of time. Taking this into account, we should see what will
happen with its global objectives, that is, with its operations in other
continents. Human intelligence may be affected in gathering information,
depending on the target country or region where there is interest. Where London
has adept governments and mere puppets driven by economic incentives that run
below the table of corrupt rulers, there are no problems. In others where they
have had intervention to build repressive and intelligence devices together
with their partners in Washington, there is some security, although there is no
guarantee of freedom from leaks.
In the case of
Argentina, due to the question of the Falklands Islands and the adjacent
waters, the variety of voluntary sources of information to safeguard British
interests does not present problems for WhiteHall. The current situation in the
country may present some surprise, but nothing that takes London by mistake. In
some Argentine forums it is speculated that the Brexit could complicate the
British trade with the archipelago since the same in this sector, is carried
forward with advantageous tariffs. The departure of London from the block would
mean for these naive, an advantage for Buenos Aires that seem not to learn from
the double standards and the dirty tricks that the Foreing Office mounts behind
appearances. Likewise, the issue of the South Atlantic islands is a problem
that is breaking the brakes in the Ministry of Defense that has begun to accuse
more budgetary problems at the door and recommendations to reduce military
units. The maintenance and military operation of Mount Pleasant and the
administration of Port Stanley will be costly but for the Foreign Office it is
an unrenounceable priority.
This is a
comment on what speculates some political sectors and intellectuals in
Argentina who believe that London was weakening in such a way that it could
abandon its presence in the Falklands. If they really believe that, they are
undoubtedly more candid than the Department of Psychological Studies has ruled
on the average behavior of the inhabitants of the Pampas. For years, London has
been preparing an agenda with the Kelper population that is assisted
successfully by the air and maritime bridge with Chile, a firm ally of Great
Britain.
This does not
mean that London is going to dispense with its defense and even less the
subsidy of its military and intelligence forces as Argentina's governments in
the past 37 years have so clumsily declined. The situation in Argentina is
neutral, tending to favor the Foreign Office and operating with human teams
under their noses is not a problem. In addition, the electronic and cybernetic
intelligence of the GCHQ is fully operational on communications of all kinds in
the region and particularly in Argentina with its submarine cable punctured
again a few years ago by divers teams S.B.S.
All this also
represents costs and expenses that cannot be ignored and the new framework of a
Great Britain without the company of the European bloc to pay for part of the
movements to this part of the world will be felt more than.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario