“TARGET: BELARUS”
What will be the
outcome of what is already seen as another subversive intervention by the West
in Eurasia?
By Dany Smith
All means that allow NATO to
enter Eurasia are allowed no matter what the consequences of it may be. In the
last 20 years, the use of the strategy of persuasion through the so-called
“color revolution”, known as “soft blows” in which psychological agitation and
manipulation of the masses are used –in
which certain media participate- to destabilizing governments not aligned
with Washington, in recent years have been complemented with the use of
clandestine violence and sabotage by special groups, as the most used variant
for these purposes.
Under the silly history
of the “promotion of democracy” and “freedom”, Washington through various means
deploys a series of dirty tactics that are framed in an agenda of global
domination that has as one of its objectives postponed in Eurasia, control the
same Russian Federation. This race comes from the very fall of the USSR and was
not stopped by the supposed good intentions of the new era of “peace and
friendship” that had emerged between Washington and Moscow. All the talk and
those good intentions embodied in speeches, executive orders and projects such
as the National Security Strategy under the Bill Clinton administration in 1996
that raised "prospects for political stability, peaceful resolution of
conflicts and greater dignity for the peoples of the world. ”, They went to the
pipe as soon as George W. Bush and his mixed band of neoconservatives and
Zionists took office, who launched a harmful farce that, among other things,
tried to argue that their actions were framed in their interest to bring
democracy and freedom … By force of torture and the point of a rifle.
The manipulation of the political-social reality through the operations of Transnational agencies and supposedly independent NGOs, dedicated to promoting “democratic values” and supposed humanitarian aid, has been the most common “Trojan Horse” to create innocent screens to penetrate the countries in order to generate subversive atmospheres and agitation against governments that are an obstacle to the ambitions of Washington and Brussels. A perfidious but very effective tactic to take advantage of the conditions of calamity and despair created by the governments of the countries from which these supposed aid originate.
In Latin America
we have already verified this with the NATO landing in Colombia and the
deployment of immediate information agitation and intoxication operations
promoted by the Corporation of local media -related
to the United States-, civil rights groups and other supposedly
humanitarian groups (financed by the State Department) that claiming to provide
aid for the misery to which Venezuelans are subjected by the trade sanctions
that Washington has been applying since 2014, they try to soften the Venezuelan
population from two sides (and playing good and bad) to permeate it to the
point of leading them to betray their own government.
NATO's ambitions
to control all of Eurasia require its strategic access to the region. For this
they need excuses and what better way to do this than to exploit the internal
problems and divisions (political, ethnic and / or religious) that exist within
each country. In the case of Belarus, the excuses to deploy a color revolution
have a name and surname, Alexandre Lukashenko. And it is that 26 years of
government (in Western eyes) seems a more than extensive period for a
presidential term, but what the hell does NATO or Washington have to do with
judging this socio-political reality? As can be seen, we are once again before
the accusing finger of the Anglo-Saxon sermonizer who tries to impose his own
visions by teaching political morality without seeing his own horrors of
failures.
Obviously the
brains behind these operations do not pay attention to those details. The
business is to mark the defects of others and sell solutions that will not
solve anything. Putting their declamations of support for democracy first, not
taking for granted that they have disastrous internal situations that
contradict what they claim to defend, has been the continuous tactic to carry
out each one of the external interventions in their corresponding magnitude.
There is no
doubt in understanding that´s Belarusians are fed up with a government that
does not seem to meet the expectations of its population and that, to top it
all, it renewed its tenure in government after the last August 9 elections. The
youth is the one who most demands changes in their country and by the way, this
is very legitimate, but something very different is that foreign interests take
advantage of these anxieties for their own benefit.
It is clear that any situation of stagnation cannot bring prosperity but this should not serve for other nations using dark organizations with clear non-holy intentions and totally remote from the popular interests of the citizens, they co-opt and manipulate the masses so that once Having achieved their objectives, they discard them as has already been seen with horrifying examples in various regions of the globe.
Belarus is a
palatable snack for NATO and Lukashenko knows that very well. But the one who
is most sure of this is Vladimir Putin. It is a piece of the puzzle that the
Atlantic organization has been shaping since it began to absorb Eastern
European countries such as Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia and of course, Poland,
which in addition to having a common border with Belarus, is currently one of
the most enthusiastic hosts of US troops and missiles. And Belarus is the only
country that still resists being co-opted by this Western expansionist ambition
and the one who most worried that it will continue like this is Russia.
At the same
time, the Russian government knows that the demonstrations that are being
organized in the capital Minsk are not mobilized by spontaneous organizations
of its population or by the calls of a charismatic 37-year-old girl named
Svetlana Tijanóvskaya. There is a stale smell behind it that is more
reminiscent of the demonstrations in Maidan Square in Ukraine in February 2014.
To this day, no
one believes that these types of Western deployments are developed for “love of
freedom” and “democracy”. On the contrary, sources in the field have been
seeing how they operate through social networks and in the same streets,
subjects from third countries, curiously aligned with Washington, are behind
the calls and certainly, these types of organizations have funding black.
The objective is
clear. In this movement there is a specific and final objective which is to
break control of Ukraine and by land to the Crimean Peninsula.
