EN LA MIRA
"THE HOUR OF THE KNIFE"
What are the real reasons for the arrest and raid against Julian Assange. Freedom of information right is dangerous?
By Dany Smith
A disturbing silence invaded
the embassy of Ecuador in London, something worried his most illustrious and
complicated guest who from the upper window of the house on 3rd Street, 3 Hans
Cres in Knigthbridge of the British capital looked anxiously at what It happened
on the street. At one point several cars and cars of the British police were
parked in the front of the building and with a hurry, more than a dozen
plainclothesmen accompanied by metropolitan "bobbies" penetrated the
doors of the legation. The government of Quito, under pressure from Washington,
had suddenly ceased the asylum of the creator of the site "Wikileaks"
and released his hand allowing the British police forces (with the safe
presence of US agents) to enter the building to arrest him.
Freedom of
information had received a stab wound. There is no other way in which this
arbitrary act can be described. Julian Assange for years was in the sights of
the US State Department and his British colleagues from the Foreign Office who
after intense negotiations with the current neoliberal government of Ecuador,
was handed over on a silver platter by the government of Lenin Moreno.
The motives for
his capture are none other than to show who exposed the abominations and
aberrant violations of human rights that the US and its allies committed in
Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and the endless pressure actions and veiled threats
through channels diplomats to governments that did not want to follow their
directives. It also caused great annoyance the revelations about the network of
pederasty that is known as the "Pizza-Gate", the ventilation of the
compromising emails of Hillary Clinton linked on dirty issues in Libya and the
established with the renowned Zionist John Podesta.
The issue
"Chelsea Manning" was undoubtedly the straw that overflowed the glass
and annoyed the mood of the influential neoconservative sectors in Washington.
Bradley Manning was an officer of the US military who filtered thousands of
documents to Julian Assange which after being discovered by an intelligence
investigation inside the unit where he was working, was arrested and convicted
of "conspiracy" in 2013 to 35 years of prison where he was until
2017.
There was no
lack of suggestions that he be executed for treason. Also before Obama left the
White House, he signed his pardon in 2017 and went free where he presented
himself with a change in his life as a transsexual, now called Chelsea
Elisabeth Manning. Likewise, with the arrival of Trump and under the pressure
of the Republican hawks, his freedom was rendered ineffective and Manning
returned to prison.
It is a warning
that the neocon sector and its allies in the war party want to make public to
terrorize the seekers of the truth conditioning the freedom of information and
the press. An article by Glen Greenwald in "The Intercept" exposes
this situation with clear clarity.
Perhaps one of
the most controversial revelations of "Wikileaks" has been the
telephone and cybernetic espionage activities carried out by the NSA and the
CIA on mobile phones of leaders of allied countries such as Germany, Italy and
France, causing undeniable damage in the trust that lasts until today.
It was thanks to
the work of Assange and his collaborators (including Manning), that world
public opinion was able to access some of the darkest and most compromising
secrets of Washington's foreign policy. One of the most forceful and perhaps
most graphic of the fury against humanity, was that massacre captured live
during the occupation of Iraq in 2007 by the cameras of a US helicopter
"Apache", where it can be seen as a group of men and Iraqi children
who were gathered in a Baghdad neighborhood, after being lighted with the
sights of the device, are deliberately machine-gunned, causing a true massacre
and even repeating the attack on vehicles trying to rescue the wounded.
The scenes were
so perfidious and disgusting that they only boosted that memory by the images
already present in the minds of the Iraqis and who traveled the world who could
see in their own flesh what American democracy meant, with filming and
abominable photographs taken a few years before (2004) in the “Abu-Graib”
Concentration Camp, controlled and run by the Americans.
The worst of
that was that thanks to one of his own military (Manning) and perhaps many
others who remain hidden in anonymity and who helped to ventilate the
uncomfortable and illegal practices of torture and other aberrations carried
out by sinister groups of military and private contracted tasks (led by the
CIA), I provide “Wikileaks” with access to that black hole of intelligence
operations that the conventional media would not have-and would not dare-ever
penetrate. Do not forget that in these dirty businesses were involved many
respected civilian professionals of academic rank, doctors, lawyers,
psychiatrists and psychologists who collaborated in these dirty matters,
including officials who as the head of the CIA, currently occupy functions in
the administration of Trump.
This also
touches the former NSA agent Eduard Snowden, who after revealing how the agency
operated illegally through social networks like Facebook, was able to flee
quickly and take refuge in the Russian Federation where he undoubtedly has
greater guarantees that the State Department American and the CIA cannot
influence the Kremlin government.
The images of a
Julian Assange dragged from his asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy by a dozen
men, cannot be more opprobrious for the already decrepit image of the
nonexistent North American democracy. For a long time, the power structure in
the US has been co-opted by this sector that lives on the pain of others, the
promotion of crises and wars where private interests call them, without
scruples of those who may be harmed by their actions. Here we have already seen
it, there are no differences between democrats or republicans; Some, like
others, carried out bloody aggressive campaigns on sovereign states, thus
participating to a greater or lesser extent, of the most detestable
humanitarian crises of the late twentieth century and those that currently
shake several regions of the globe.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario