AERODYNAMIC OPERATION

The background on the nefarious interference of the US and NATO in Eurasia supporting extremists and pro-Nazis were well hidden in government files. The Nazism that feeds the regime of Volodymyr Zelensky is an undeniable reality. In this framework, is Russia's attempt to eradicate it illegitimate?

By Danny Smith

When the world saw the sudden appearance of ISIS back in June 2014, the media portrayed it as a unique and brutal phenomenon originating from Islamic extremism. The media presented it as the emblem of “Islamic terrorism”. It was just a big lie, one more in the long race to manipulate public opinion. For three years they were able to deceive a part of the public opinion but it soon became clear that these masked guys with sophisticated weapons, mobilized in brand new trucks fresh from the production lines, were nothing more than a puppet of Anglo-American intelligence.

That was the same origin and development of the Ukrainian phil-Nazi extremist groups and perhaps all of Eastern Europe at the end of the Second World War, the ideological nucleus of the current fundamentalist regime in Kiev. The CIA and its colleagues from MI6 were the ones who, in the middle of the Second World War and especially at its end, recruited, financed and supported the terrorist operations of nationalist groups against the local authorities of the Soviet Union.

It was the most reasonable and viable option given Churchill's proposal to betray the Russians before they took Berlin by agreeing with the remnants of Nazism to drop atomic bombs on the main cities of the USSR. Contain and wear down would be the basis of the plan.

As part of these plans, in 1947 the CIA had installed itself on the edges of the then USSR with the already preconceived idea of ​​sabotaging the political administrations of the satellite countries, but in particular, those that were strategic to harm Moscow. Ukraine was seen as the door for these plans not only because of its geographical position but also because of the quality of the human resources that operated there. It was in this way that in 1947, the new intelligence structure called the CIA led by then Admiral Sidney Souers launched “Operation Aerodinamic” aimed at supporting and protecting Ukrainian nationalist groups. Thus, while the Americans and British were launching NATO in 1949, their intelligence agencies were already covertly working with characters like Stepan Bandera (considered a national hero), Dmitro Dontsov, Yaroslav Stesko, Andriy Melnik and Mikoya Lebed, such Perhaps the most important referents of Ukrainian nationalist extremism who during the war, had been recruited by the German SS and under said regime, carried out all kinds of crimes and massacres against minorities that polluted national purity.

But beyond that extremist ideological affiliation, the actions and personal talents of each of these characters (if it can be said that way) was what caught the attention of the CIA, who would know how to take advantage of them for their own benefit. His stark cruelty, racism and hatred against the Russians were qualities that Washington and London would exploit to try to destabilize the USSR no matter what sadistic and bloody methods they used. Precisely, the use of all kinds of torture, humiliation and excessive cruelty was what the CIA was looking for to use them not only there but where necessary.

Morality is something that was not taken into account here and the historical evidence of this is more than compelling.

This is a part of the story that “the free world” and especially Washington has been hiding for decades and that is only part of the methodological dynamics of other dirty secrets that link Nazism and the use of terrorism with the proclaimed “democracies Westerners”. As will be seen, the use of torture, murder, terrorism and disappearances did not start in Iraq with the Abu-Graib scandal, nor in Guantánamo Cuba or Bagram in Afghanistan. After the declassification and airing of this operation, the media have been trying to change the tenor of their actions and the nature of the Ukrainian pro-Nazi organizations (UPA), describing them as “anti-Soviet resistance”.

For the CIA bureau and the State Department the key word was “instigate” to create mistrust both among the Ukrainians who would see the Soviet authorities as unable to protect them and in turn, the mistrust of the Russians against the Ukrainians. In this way they launched the so-called “Operation Aerodynamic” that was buried for 75 years as classified. The name “Aerodynamic” signified the way in which the CIA and its partners supported these cells, which they supplied by launching all the material necessary for them to operate clandestinely from airplanes. With this it is clear that Washington not only knew who were implementing terrorism in Ukraine, but also, they were part of its execution, as is the case today after the attacks against the Dugina, the Kerch bridge, Nord Stream and the last terrorist attack that killed Russian journalist Maxim Fomin in a restaurant in Saint Petersburg.

If we use reasoning a bit and make a cold analysis of all these precedents and the arguments with which Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the intervention in Ukraine on February 24, 2022, denazification as one of the objectives of “Operation Special Military” arises justified in the light not only of these horrible precedents but of those that since 2014 have been accumulating throughout Ukraine but particularly in the Donbass region.

The courts of history will claim all this and even if your editors work day and night to erase it, it will not help.