“RETURNING TO THE SOURCE”
Why is the return of unity in the Arab-Islamic
resistance a fact?
By Ali Al Najafy
The complexity of relations between the various nations
that make up the Arab world was undoubtedly altered by the forced implantation
in 1948 of an artificial and arbitrary state, created by a group of European
Zionists supported by a strong British (political and diplomatic) influence. With
each year that Israel remained, the situation of the Palestinian Arab population
became more precarious and at the same time the controversies and complications
between the Arab states of the region were widening.
His permanence and subsequent influence over the
entire region was due to the enormous support of the United States, especially
during the period of Donald Trump. But in the current circumstances of
geopolitical change with the war in Europe, the interests and priorities of the
various actors in the Middle East are clearly affected to unexpected limits and
that also reaches Israel.
The effects of Russian actions in Ukraine are shaping
reunions and rapprochement between regional actors previously in dispute and
that is not good for Tel Aviv. Added to the growing turmoil inside the occupied
territories and especially in the West Bank, it is leading Israel's military
and intelligence chiefs to try to propose solutions to an impossible situation.
Although they manage to get some cooperation from Fatah, the fury of the
villagers overcomes the fear that Abbas's henchmen try to impose.
The case of Iran and Saudi Arabia is central in this
scenario since both nations have been for years -and fostered by Washington
from behind the scenes- in a virtual state of war, measuring themselves
militarily in Yemen and more covertly in Iraq and Syria. This undoubtedly
worries Tel Aviv a lot since this situation meant a strategic advantage with
expectations of increasing over time. It is known that Tel Aviv has been
operating in Iraq for some time, increasing its presence after the 2003
invasion. With its Kurdish allies, the Israeli intelligence services with
headquarters in Kurdistan have been part of the terrorist activities against
Baghdad and especially against Iran.
The case of Syria was especially important for Tel Aviv
since it remains one of the Arab countries with which it has been in a state of
war for decades. The aggression orchestrated in 2012 from the West (USA, Great
Britain and France) promised to end the Arab nationalist government of Bashar
Al Assad just as the Anglo-Americans did with Saddam Hussein in Iraq and NATO
with Muhammar Al Gaddafi in Libya. Clearly, the prospects were promising for
Israel and that is why it gladly collaborates on those plans.
With the Syrians immersed in internal chaos and busy
fighting terrorist gangs, the Israelis would take the opportunity to try to
take advantage not only of Syrian territory and the internal situation in
Lebanon (supporting “Al Nusra” jihadist gangs) but also, to extend its
operations over the Horn of Africa and the entire Arabian Peninsula. But
despite these grand expectations they were soon conditioned to maneuver without
the freedom they thought they expected. In September 2015, Russian President
Vladimir Putin, considering what happened in Libya in 2011, aware of what was
really happening and anticipating that it could spread to the Caucasus (ISIS
terrorism), agreed to help the Syrian Arab Republic to fight terrorism.
We must not forget that context and the actors that
were deployed. Despite the controversies that Barak Obama's statements aroused,
it was his administration that took the lead in all this display. A
confederation of Takfir and Wahabi groups financially supported by Riyadh and
other gulf-monarchies, under the direction of Paris and later Washington, tried
to tear the country apart and divide it into confessional regions, that is, a
Sunni and a Shiite sector. To do this, they tried to implement urban terror
with ghost cells that alternately attacking Christian, Sunni, Shia and Alawites
targets would create rancor among the communities as they had done (through
counterinsurgency tactics) in Iraq during the occupation (2003/ 2011).
Let us also not forget the crushing appearance of “ISIS”
over Iraq in 2014 and the crucial role it played in the entire “Fight against
Terrorism” hoax deployed by the US and lasting until 2017. The intervention of
the Russian Aerospace Forces brought to light several embarrassing situations
that betrayed the artificiality of “ISIS”. That exposed the duplicities of that
pseudo-Islamic organization that received support from the Americans.
The rapprochement that they have achieved with the
efforts of the Donald Trump administration through the “Abrahamic Agreement”
with the United Arab Emirates could begin to capsize in the face of this change
in relations in the Arab-Islamic world that regroups the Arab-Islamic
resistance axis with the Palestinian cause as a center of action. Bashar Al
Assad's tour of the Arab Emirates, Russia and Iran seems to demonstrate this,
although the most accentuated concern is in the cooperation between Damascus
and Tehran.
For Prime Minister Naftaly Bennett and his personal
circle, this is due to Washington's loss of political weight in the region, and
they accuse this of Joe Biden's unclear and weak management, which has been
associated with the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario