“WASHINGTON…WE HAVE A TROUBLE”

Reality prevails over propaganda and that shows that Zelensky and his gang have lost control of the situation. Where is the covering fire?

By Danny Smith

The surprising events that took place in eastern Ukraine between June 24 and 25 have left both Zelensky's western sponsors and the Western Media Corporation without comment, which has tried to draw a triumphalist epic (like the one told about the battle of Chornobaivka) and anti-Russian that tried to achieve what economic sanctions and weapons have not been able to achieve.

The grand tale of the resiliency and audacity of the Ukrainian forces to inflict severe damage on the invaders spread by the BBC, CNN, FoxNews and the entire arc of electronic media supported by the State Department and the White House simply has made smoke.

The electronic portals of neoconservative thought have stopped producing opinion articles and analyzes about what for them would be happening in Ukraine. Is it an odious coincidence?

The Ukrainian commanders themselves know that there is nothing left to do and that is why they have ordered the immediate withdrawal from Severodonetsk and the surrounding villages. Saving the remnants of a decent fighting force is crucial as fighters are in short supply. And it is impossible to continue holding positions that have been demolished by the Russian artillery, the counterattacks of the Russian-speaking Ukrainian militiamen of the RPD and RPL, adding to this, the scarce stock of ammunition and with fewer men it is reasonable to retreat. As a way to fill this hole, more criminals and women are being recruited. What remains for the brains of Kyiv is to bet on the victimization and the accusation of war crimes against the Russians, which undoubtedly will exist, but which does not exempt those committed by Zelensky's Nazi battalions.

Unlike what happened to the Americans and British in Iraq, the Russians do have allies on the ground and are a critical tactical player on this chessboard. On the contrary, the Anglo-Saxons had to resort to dirty tactics, a lot of money and the machinery of torture to try to get a handful of Iraqis on their side, including traitors, criminals and all kinds of scum who would sell to his mother for about two hundred bucks. And still, they failed to win.

The Ukrainian withdrawal reveals a reality that the apparatus that supports Zelensky and his NATO sponsors undermines their plans.

This undoubtedly caused serious upset in Washington that obviously soon reached Boris Johnson's offices in “Downing Street” and immediately reverberated in the British Parliament where the Conservatives have placed all their bets on the comedian from Kyiv and his extreme right-wing pro-Nazi regime. It is the comment in the halls of this room “What will we do if we cannot hold Zelensky?”. Just as many suspect a dirty hit.

All the resources made available to the comedian seem to have been wasted. Many of the heavy weapons that were delivered by France, Germany and British supplies have been captured by the Russians but only then does the problem begin. Analysts would be speculating that another large portion of those shipments were either unused, misused, or mismanaged. It is also very likely that much of these weapons are on the black market and available to customers with cash. The billions of dollars that the White House has turned over to its colorful representative of “freedom and democracy” would not have ended up solving the cause but to fatten the pockets of its corrupt officials.

We have grown tired of hearing the pro-Atlantist propaganda that exaggerated with childish triumphalism and fanciful touches the effectiveness of Lockheed Martin and Raytheon anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles on Russian tanks and planes. We suspect it was just marketing hype to sell their products to interested war watchers, nothing new.

The reality is that whoever has the most strength is the one who will win and for this the weapons are decisive. Consolidated, the Russian military victory over Ukraine would constitute a political disaster for Washington and Brussels that would deal a mortal blow to the structure of NATO. Vladimir Putin's government gave them the opportunity for legal and diplomatic foundations to be established so that this would not go as far as it has gone and that is why the Anglo-Saxons, aware of this, are remorseful about the miscalculated risks of pushing Kyiv to defy to Russia.

Lithuania's recent outrage by blocking rail access to Kaliningrad seems to be a card up NATO's sleeve that coincides with the deployment of British, Canadian, German and American troops in the Baltic countries as a way of putting pressure on Moscow at a time when Ukrainians crumble and withdraw from Donbass. Apparently the Lithuanian government is playing the dangerous game of the Brussels bureaucrats without apparently realizing that they are being used as decoys in the mousetrap that this Russian enclave on the Baltic would mean. This also reveals how the Atlantic organization has expanded ignoring the requests for security agreements raised by Moscow during 2021 and at the same time continues to type provocations against Russia behind the scenes.