PATCHING HOLES IN HISTORY

Why was the commemoration of the Normandy landings manipulated?

 

By Sidney Hey

For the past 80 years, 6 June has been a date that revives an episode in history that changed the course of geopolitics for the rest of the 20th century. The landing of the Allied forces on the beaches of Normandy was one of the largest and most calamitous military operations of the so-called Second World War in which, according to official figures (which halve the real numbers), 10,000 Allied men died as soon as they stepped off the barges.

For decades the commemoration was just one more, a solemn act recalling the sacrifice and horror born of political pettiness and colonial squabbles that led to the birth of ideologies such as fascism, Nazism that would end up leading to a war that should never be repeated. 

Normandy was one of the steps to defeat the Third Reich and not the only one, as governments and their media in the West have been saying for some time now. If the then Soviet Russia had not broken through the eastern front and advanced on Europe, things would have been complicated for the Allies, as US General Patton and his Franco-British colleagues knew very well, but so did the alcoholic war criminal and Russophobe Winston Churchill.

Today, in the midst of the current geopolitical circumstances, this commemoration is given a new, clearly Manichean and argumentatively distorted narrative that only seeks to create a sort of historical equivalence between that mega battle and the one that NATO, through its neo-Nazi puppet in Kiev, is trying to make prevail today against the Russian Federation.

Those who have at least studied history will realise this. The two situations are not only impossible to equate, they also demonstrate the crass contradiction that the leaders of the collective West are incurring in, as evidenced by their current interference in Ukraine.  That 1944 Normandy landing was part of the fight against Nazism and what these corrupt Western ‘democracies’ are doing today in Ukraine is resurrecting it to further Washington's interests under hilarious semantic disguises.

No doubt it was Joe Biden who took advantage of the occasion at the ceremony held at the ‘Colleville sur Mer’ cemetery to deploy this discursive tactic by claiming ‘that he will continue to defend Ukraine from falling under the Russian yoke’ while warning that ‘democracy is more threatened than ever’. But Biden should ask himself, what have we been doing for democracy, peace and global stability?

Indeed, that is a question that neither he nor any of his cohorts will be able to answer, for they have done the opposite. Washington's foreign policies over the last thirty years have been the cause of the destruction of countries, their societies and the creation of continuous migratory flows that end up landing on European soil with the consequent economic, social and cultural impact that their governments deny. Thanks to Biden and his unconditional European subjects such as Macron, Sunak, or the ‘sausage’ Scholz, they have made this war a fabulous business for the arms industry, especially the US, of course.

Once again. Biden's speech might have been credible if it had not been the US president who, after having been part of the Obama administration in 2013, had worked to engineer the coup in Kiev in February 2014, installed an adept regime, instigated together with his Atlanticist partners the unleashing of the current war in Ukraine and its open support for a pro-Nazi regime led by a shoddy comedian like Volodymyr Zelensky. Contrasting all this, one can see the historical contradiction we are talking about.

No matter how much is spent on stagecraft, bombastic speeches and falsifiers of history, the evidence and facts do not support Joe Biden's words at all, but much worse, they show him for what he really is. Today the culture clash that the continuous landing of immigrants in Europe is creating tensions with the eugenic and transhumanist subculture that makes LGTBQ an anti-family way of life irreconcilable with the values of the Islamic migratory currents that make the family a way of life.

This is what annoys the European elites that lackeys like Von Der Leyen, Borrell and their cronies, who under the garb of freedom and broadmindedness see in these values brought by migrants a threat to their twisted way of life.

In conclusion, that landing in Normandy is a fact of history without comparison to the delusional lucubrations that currently try to justify criminal agendas of powers that ironically behave as did the Third Reich and its mad dream of perpetuating its hegemony for a thousand years.