DELICIOUSLY STUPID

Why are Trump's decisions and comments endangering the world?

 

By Sir Charlattam 

It is already clear that Donald Trump and his Republican administration do not seek peace if it does not suit their interests. We have not really discovered the gunpowder with this observation, but it is good to highlight it in order to expose the lies and intoxication to which the mass media have accustomed us.

Not even with the best of Hollywood scripts (if there were any) could the US media disguise the stupidity and arrogance of a president who, kicking his own campaign words, today launches ultimatums against all those who are an obstacle to the plans of the internationalists and their colleagues of revisionist Zionism who nestle in the cubicles of power in Washington.

Trump could have been a very good comedian on shows like Saturday Night Live in his native New York or even and may be in time to do so with other such hilarious and tragic comedians as Keir Starmer and David Lammy in their British version to be aired on Sky Max.

Trump's arrogance, mixed with childish whims that he embodies with his grimaces and hilarious gestures, could arouse laughter, but a moment later we see that this stridency is part of the behaviour of a psychopath who believes he can decree the death of tens of thousands and smile before the cameras like an imbecile. With the same arrogance he tried to fool the government of the Russian Federation with talk of seeking peace; and when Vladimir Putin proved him wrong, an obfuscated Trump issued a 50-day ultimatum to stop the war or he would impose higher tariffs.

But while the comedian Trump spoke of his interest in stopping the war in Ukraine, teams of SBU saboteurs and Atlanticist mercenary cells -with British involvement- were launching attacks with drones and GRAD systems against the populations bordering historic Russia, causing civilian deaths and injuries. He stepped up high-precision missile strikes against command centres, arms industries and weapons storage centres in Ukraine (especially in the ports of Odessa), accelerating the deterioration of their supply lines on the front line.

Even one of the targets of the hypersonic ‘Khinzal’ missiles was unit 169th, a training and troop assembly centre in Goncharovskoye, a settlement in the north-western part of Chernigov Oblast, which was literally wiped out. The loss in manpower was so catastrophic that it is possible that among the more than 200 bodies there are a few British and other Atlanticist advisers. By now the situation in Pokrovsk is critical and the Ukrainian forces are almost surrounded in a cauldron that foreshadows their elimination.  

Stunned by this, what could Trump do? He doubled down like a game of chicken and reduced his ultimatum to 10 days in the belief that Putin would chicken out. Before the response came, Kremlin officials were already beginning to warn that the US partner's tactics were highly risky for peace. Perhaps most emphatic in pointing this out was former premier Dmitry Medvedev, who warned the US and especially Donald Trump of the dangers of continuing to play on Russia's patience with its ‘ultimatum game’.

What was Trump's reaction? He ordered the mobilisation of two nuclear submarines to ‘appropriate regions’ which in one sentence means ‘a latent threat’ and a dangerous provocation against Russia's sovereignty.

Who would have suggested to Trump to use the navy to challenge Moscow? I ask this because on 21 July last year the Russian fleets conducted a mega naval exercise called ‘July Storm’, which was carried out very successfully in two seas and two oceans. From these exercises it was possible to conclude a very good performance of coordination and precision in the development of combat operations against surface targets and also against submarine threats. It was against this background that Trump sent two nuclear submarines to intrude into the waters of the Russian Federation...genius!

It is this same genius that we see in the treatment of the situation in the Middle East, particularly in trying to normalise Israel's genocide against the Palestinian population and its ambitions to expand into Lebanon where it is no longer a secret that the Republican administration is an active and enthusiastic participant in pro-Israeli actions and in that plan, it has proposed that the Arab Islamic resistance should disarm.

There is no doubt that to Netanyahu and his officials that would be ideal and although Trump's envoys have carried this ‘proposal’ which is nothing more than a threat, the Lebanese Arab citizens themselves and the Palestinians throughout Gaza know that to accept that would be something like a ticket to total subjugation under Israeli occupation. Without a force to oppose Israeli plans, the territories and vital resources such as drinking water would be under the total control of companies answerable to Tel Aviv.

In short, Trump's intention is that both the Lebanese Shiite resistance movement Hezbollah and AMAL and the armed groups that make up the Palestinian resistance should hand over their weapons to Israel, which by all accounts, given the abuses and crimes of the IDF, would be a foolish thing to do. But there is nothing to be lost by trying. With this proposal Trump is trying to sow division within both peoples trying to weaken the political idea of opposing Israel's occupation and to some extent make it easier or easier for his henchmen to physically eliminate anyone who opposes Israel. 

Let us not forget that it was this same Trump who in his first term tried to use these tactics with North Korea and what did he achieve? He got Pyongyang to strengthen its defence policy and nuclear development along with the technological development of its missiles. On that occasion, the only thing left for a frustrated and annoyed Trump to do was to label Kim Jong Un as ‘rocket man’.

He did the same with Iran after abandoning the nuclear development talks and after the fiasco of the attack on the three Iranian facilities just to please Netanyahu and the Zionist establishment to which he answers, he has tried to disguise that failure with words only by trying to tell the Iranians "don't do it again or I'll hit you again! "

But the genius in the White House may not realise that by these mafia-like threats (which foment more deaths and greater distrust) and these comical expressions he only strengthens the resolve of his enemies and makes the world a more insecure place.