UNDERCOVER FIGHTING

Why Washington and its Atlanticist partners have passed all the limits of legality and do not mind doing so?

By Danny Smith 

Definitely, the fall of the USSR in 1991 was not the breakthrough towards a lasting peace that candid intellectuals and other malicious ones assured. Perhaps some disguised themselves as the former and, like psychopaths who know how to simulate their true intentions, quietly enjoyed what was about to happen.

Let us revive our memory a little. The loss of the geopolitical counterweight that was the USSR led the US and NATO to rise as the unilateral power over all the nations of the world and that immediately translated into the naked and crude application of military power. That explains why NATO was not dissolved. The invasions of Panama in 1989 and the war against Iraq in 1991 were the prolegomena of a decade of brutal actions against international law.

To cover up this aberration, the Anglo-American Think Tanks fabricated all kinds of argumentative monikers and narratives that sought to separate and in most of these cases, justify the criminality of the deaths that their governments would begin to cause as soon as they began to put their plans into operation (PNAC). The star puppet for this charade was Islam, very clever, don't you think?

Throughout this process, international organizations such as the United Nations, not to mention its Security Council, were like decorations without the slightest weight in their functions. All it took was a private phone call from the US State Department to the Secretary General for no one to lift a finger against the actions that Washington was putting into practice.

The return of a geopolitical counterweight to the international scene gives a chance to put an end to this Anglo-American unilateralism in pursuit of global control.

Precisely this return with the new Russia came about gradually, beginning with its intervention in Syria in 2015 to combat bands of “proxy jihadists” at the service of the West, and since February 2022 it has become a frontal fight with those who had promoted all that chaos. Prior to this and long before Joe Biden occupied the White House, he himself as a senator and his neoconservative colleagues in the mid-1990s outlined a reactivation agenda to expand US influence with the help of NATO and that implied cooperating with Islamist subversive elements in pro-independence countries.

The planned expectations were not fulfilled and although they managed to make Russia react to enter Ukraine, Vladimir Putin's potentiality and governance is still intact.

It is undoubtedly a frustration that the Anglo-Americans have tried to palliate with the most varied tactics. One of them is the use of terrorism in various forms. The use of terror is one of the most widely used strategies to try to defeat an enemy and has been used since man began to organize himself into communities.

For years it has been said that terrorism was only a source of irregular organizations and with certain affiliations. But in reality as a tactic, it has been and continues to be used by governments, especially so-called “democratic” ones.

In the current Ukrainian scenario, intelligence agencies have been visibly acting in the execution of attacks within the Russian territory with the aim of instilling terror among the population as they did on other occasions.

From what we have been able to see so far, the execution of this type of operations, especially those involving bombs, has been counting on the participation of expert hands that have clearly executed countless attacks of this kind in Iraq and Syria and that if we were to go back to 2014 the Western media would attribute to that pseudo-Arab-Islamic pantomime called “Islamic State”. The attack of October 8, 2022 with that truck bomb that was detonated on the bridge connecting the Kerch Strait reminded by its similarities a “martyrdom” operation of those impostors drugged with “Captagon” Or are the unemployed of that bloody comedy working for Zelensky, or are they part of the CIA advisors or both at the same time? Whatever it is, the media and its communicators have their mouths very well shut.

Since the bombing that killed the daughter of Russian political scientist Alexander Dugin, it became clear who was the favorite target of this terror campaign. Although the Ukrainian agent identified as Natalya Pavlovna Vovk was involved and managed to escape to Lithuania, it was recently reported that she was found hanged. This makes it clear how her employers paid her for her services. Of course, as with the Nord Stream pipelines and the Nova Kharkova dam, Washington claimed to be unaware of her involvement, but several U.S. sources confirmed that it was the CIA that was directing SBU cells and other Nordic agencies to carry out this type of action. It was not long before Russian author and novelist Zakhar Prilepin was the target of a similar attack that failed to kill him.

Another such event was the April 2023 assassination of Russian blogger Maxim Fomin, who was in a café in St. Petersburg when an explosive charge was detonated in a gift given to him by a young woman named Darya Trepova, who had been recruited by the SBU, and the list of attacks against facilities inside Russia goes on, but where is the outrage in the Western press about these terrorist tactics?

The discovery of an extensive plan to assassinate Russian journalists with RT director Margarita Simonian at the head, has put in black and white who the real orchestrators of international terrorism have been and are, and the degree of impunity they have to dare to consider such criminal plans. If it were not a power like Russia that can prevent and counteract these dirty operations, the citizens of another state without these capabilities would be exposed to the dirty games of these agencies. Just remember what they did in the Middle East to get an idea.

It is worth repeating that if in the past they succeeded in creating and feeding a supposed war against a method that has no ideology or religion, it was thanks to the complicity of the big media companies and the silence of the international forums that let them do it.