MANUFACTURING

THE

 HISTORY

With the Ukraine affair and its neo-Nazi junta led by Volodymyr Zelensky, after Donald Trump's turn of events, the whole American democratic rhetoric seems to be sinking under his feet.

 

By Sir Charlattam 

For some time now, it has been said that history is written by the victors, but in the current geopolitical circumstances that saying no longer applies. The epilogue of the war in Ukraine is about to be reached in which the Russian Federation will emerge triumphant, although the media and their scribes have already begun to distort the sequence of events that led to the conflagration. 

It is true that there are now social networks and a constellation of alternative sources of information that displace the official narratives of the big news companies, which, as we know, work for the powers that be. That is why a significant part of public opinion did not fall for the deceptions and manipulations of the media megacorporations, especially the American ones, which are very interested in sowing hatred of Russians as they have done for the past decade against Muslims and Arabs.

No one could have imagined, not even the neocon insiders and their partners in revisionist Zionism, that it would be an American president who would kick them off the stage. More surprised and distressed are the Europeans who, despite standing as a doormat for the Americans to do as they please on European soil, now realise that the Americans are simply throwing them in the dustbin.

The anxious running around and phone calls between Ursula Von Leyen, Kallas, Macron, a depressed Scholz and the Borrells are now part of the great misfortune that Donald Trump has become president and, to make matters worse, is fulfilling his promises.  An important sign of the EU's loss of importance is the place where Trump and Putin will meet.

Even if the signs seem to indicate that Trump is letting go of NATO's hand, we should not entirely believe this. The pre-existing political-military relations and interests are very strong and not so easy to break, even for Donald Trump. There is an anti-Russian sentiment in Europe and especially in Eastern Europe (especially in the Baltics and a very strong interest in flourishing in Moldova) that has been sown, amplified and maintained over time by benevolent and uninterested NGOs such as USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), cesspools of both dirty and taxpayers' money and operational screens of US intelligence.

At the same time, behind the ‘democracy’ and ‘freedom’ mumbo-jumbo with which the media continually bore us, there is big business revolving around contracts for the supply of armaments, equipment to sustain NATO and the armed forces of highly strategic countries with notoriously anti-Russian positions such as Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, which are unlikely to be cut off by Trump's promises.

Let's not leave aside Sir Starmer who, with clear intentions of gaining a leadership in Europe that no one has asked for, has already put on his warrior's footwear trying to send a message of support to Zelensky and his gang.

Today, after the very productive talks between Trump and Putin, the alignment of the US with Russia before the UN over the conflict in Ukraine (a stance adopted by the monkey Milei) and the expectations that are expected from the negotiations that both leaders have been conducting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, set a rather twisted framework that is very difficult to make up for the Atlanticist historians, the same ones who during the Biden-Harris administration removed the USSR from its central role in the defeat of the Third Reich.

There is no doubt that the chapter of the war that began on 24 February 2022 has an extensive prologue in which Washington played a special role, which predates even 2014 and clearly has its starting point in 1991. We need only recall that it was the intervention of the United States, we need only recall that it was the intervention of the US State Department and its ambassador in Kiev who organised since 2013 what would later erupt as a revolt in February 2014 and which the media in the West sold as a ‘revolution’ when in reality it was a coup d'état promoted by Atlanticist intelligence agencies (with the stellar participation of MI6) and carried out with mercenaries from various parts of the world who coordinated with neo-Nazi supporters of ‘Pradvy Sektor’ and other marginal groups of the same ideology.

For these historians, making up for such inconsistencies will not be so easy, let alone in this day and age. The neo-Nazis did not come to power in Kiev on their own. Who has protected them for so long?

Obama and then Biden have contributed greatly to this. They are even the main instigators in provoking Russia's reaction in 2022 after having taken advantage of the Minsk agreements to arm Kiev where a brutal offensive was planned for March of that year which, had it not been aborted by Moscow, would have been a different story. The US is undoubtedly condemned by its past.

Donald Trump seems to kick all that to the curb with his statements and his apparent public rebuke of Zelensky during his visit to the White House. If this was an act, it would seem convincing. If it is a ruse, he seems to have convinced a large part of public opinion and at the same time, he could appease the sewers of the deep state with a good deal with Vladimir Putin to divide up what is left of Ukraine.

The Atlanticist scribes and their establishment media operatives are in shock and have been petrified at their notebook keyboards. Scratching their heads and trying to find arguments to explain the inexplicable and twist hard facts, they wonder how the hell do we explain all this deception to future generations?