THE NEW MANCHURIAN
EPISODE
What has the murder of Charlie Kirk meant, and who
stands to gain from it?
By Sidney Hey
The United States has a long history of political plots and assassinations that have targeted none other than its own presidents, demonstrating that beyond the much-touted word ‘democracy’ lies a dark and terribly brutal reality hidden in the so-called ‘deep state’.
The murder of young Charlie Kirk, a conservative
activist and promoter of the values that forged his country, is not only vile,
but also surrounded by circumstances that are very worrying, not only for
opaque institutions, but also for the true freedom and security of Americans
themselves.
Kirk was born and raised in Arlington, which made him
as American as apple pie. His murder was undoubtedly not an act of madness by a
deranged individual or a ‘lone wolf’. There is an encrypted message in this
crime, and it has both a sender and a recipient. Now, who wanted to send this
message? This question has different answers depending on who is answering it.
For conservative sectors and even those close to the government (MAGA), the
possibilities range from an act by the left directing accusations at
pro-abortion and transgender Democrats to some Islamist terrorist group or
foreign invaders.
On the other hand, we will have to wait for the
evidence that is being gathered to be processed and determine whether the
alleged perpetrator is really the shooter or just a scapegoat. Within this
sector, there are also those who are more closely linked to independent sectors
who sense that the clues being presented to the media and the official account
of how this happened have a very strange smell about them.
There are many reasons why we should be suspicious of
the official version. History and similar precedents in American political life
provide ample evidence for this. From the assassination of Lincoln to the
attempt on Donald Trump himself in the middle of the election campaign, no one
can say that nothing has happened here. The conspiracy is not out there and it
is not a simple cliché, it is deep within the system itself.
Charlie Kirk was a staunch conservative activist who
invited others to express their views in genuine public debates. Unlike conventional
politicians and Trump himself, he never changed his discourse, and that is
where we will surely find the motive and the masterminds behind the attack.
With a clearly neoconservative political discourse
(aligned with Zionism), he defended all of his country's aggressions and
invasions around the world. But unlike the extremists and fanatics of his own
ilk, he allowed public debate in university lecture halls at a time when speech
had become an act of aggression, labelled as ‘hate speech’ and the era of
cancellation. He truly upheld and respected the right to free speech, which
today in the West is monitored and scrutinised by government agencies hunting
down dissidents.
In fact, these agencies, both local and their allies
(such as Israel), have made journalists and researchers prime targets for
elimination in an attempt to silence truths such as the genocide in Palestine
today, making it clear that the IDF and its intelligence agencies have been
carrying out these crimes since long before October 2023. Let us not forget the
circumstances and implications of a Zionist faction within the CIA that was
behind the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963.
This crime perpetrated against Kirk is an attack on
freedom of expression, one of many that since 2001 and from within the American
political establishment have been carried out against independent voices,
regardless of their discourse, as long as it disturbs or calls into question
their narratives.
Whether Charlie Kirk was right or wrong, he spoke
honestly and did so from his convictions, which he had grown up with and was
willing to pass on to his family and those who listened to him. But his
straightforwardness is not compatible with state policy, and that is where a
‘good guy,’ as Trump would say, becomes a nuisance that must be eliminated. And
that is where we should begin to scrutinise: What was Charlie Kirk saying in
his latest talks that could have caused offence? Or even more worryingly, how
sharp and revealing was his view of the current government's policies that it
was making the rest of the citizens think?
If we analyse the speeches and debates since the
beginning of the Trump administration, we can see how he became an
inconvenience for the broken promises and double standards we have seen.
Citizens of the world, and especially Americans, must
not be fooled by the spectacle staged by news networks and the discourse of
‘experts’ who focus on the shooter and his possible implications. The alleged
shooter who was immediately exposed to the media may be nothing more than a
scapegoat to convince citizens and close the case judicially. American history
already tells us that this is a big scam to divert attention from the real
conspirators. Today, the possibilities for fabricating and staging a scene are
as possible as they are unusual. Pre-selecting a simple mentally deficient
person who has been previously manipulated and even providing him with a rifle
that does not work, so that he can then appear in photos and videos already
directed by his employers, is not only very possible but also very useful for
covering up the real gunmen. That is why, to a certain extent, we should ask
ourselves: Is this a new case of the Manchurian Candidate?




