EN DEBATE
"TOUCHING ASSES"
What to do Buenos Aires to the provocative military maneuvers in the UK within its territorial waters?
By Dany Smith
I found no better definition for what is to
start making Britain in the South Atlantic in the coming days. naval and air
maneuvers only last a day that the Argentine media aired the expected and used
fear, the news that the Royal Navy Her Majesty would begin a series of military
exercises with a varied agenda of operational among which are counted to repel
any hostile raids fleet trying to penetrate in waters of the islands and routes
to Antarctica. Reading my favorite morning I noticed that the concern is real
but Argentina still timorous (1). All this is well known to those who serve in
the Royal Navy for decades and I can assure you that there is something more
than the sincere interest in these maneuvers to protect the Kelpers some
Argentina threat routine, which in light of the reality of the great neighbor
it is a mockery.
Someone may believe that their Kelpers
London is concerned, forget it! Or, they are very concerned about what
Argentina can do? Even less. For distinguished government officials Teresa May
and much less for the lords of the intrigue of the Foreign Office those are
nothing more than the Argentines, I can almost to ensure that look like sheep
grazing in the meadows of green lichen in Goose Green that remind me both of my
native Scotland country sides. There is definitely no other purposes behind these
expensive exercises (2% of PIB). These movements have several reasons but none
slashing interest in Kelpers who in turn are being contained by British
political bureaucrats not to bother with their claims for political autonomy.
But continuing with these facts, it is very
suggestive that the Royal Navy orchestrate this movement when things heat up
dangerously in the Middle East where they keep a small piece of cake that left
them Americans in the southern Persian Gulf. And not only that. Cross between
Washington and Moscow to go beyond to any provocation threats has led both
parties have mobilized military and tactical missiles with nuclear warheads as
a prelude to a possible confrontation that can begin in Syria, spread to
eastern Europe and reach the level overall in less than an hour.
In this context curious movements have
warned of the Royal Navy that meet requirements of Washington and worrying fall
in the Russian naval movements in the Mediterranean Sea. Just before yesterday,
an old friend swarming through the halls of "Whitehall" in Trafalgar
Square, told me anxious about the nervous walking staff high-ranking officers
who had been visited by none other than Defense Minister Michael Fallon and
star BREXIT secretary (and avowed Zionist) state Boris Johnson (2) does not
seem very causal, do not you think? And that's not all; also for months
American movements in the North Atlantic has drawn attention to the inhabitants
of the islands especially the north where causally come rehearsing with
Norwegian colleagues among others.
Apparently the concern is about the strange
decision of Russians to spend a few miles of the British coast with a powerful
naval convoy led by the aircraft carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov” bound for the
Mediterranean Sea, as head of the Royal Navy Naval His Majesty does not spare
resources to mobilize its entire fleet around the globe. It seems that this has
caused our boys of the Royal Marines guarding the coasts and the fleet to be
exercising with NATO on the Scottish coast, touched red alert over a mile from
the British eastern coast bound for Syria. But that's just an excuse for public
consumption. The actual cause of the commotion of London seems to be on a
course broader movement not only of the Russian navy but also Chinese naval
units whose strategic point of control and communications to the base in the
province of Neuquen.
real argie situation |
Now, what the hell does the South Atlantic
and the Falkland Islands in all this? Apparently everything. When I read that
the Argentine government raised angry protests by the British military
exercises that they already had planned from the previous year, it sounds
pathetically amateur. To balance these harsh comments I must say that
apparently the government of Mauricio Macri has managed affairs with greater
intelligence than pretend they are checked several changes in sight in the
Argentine military area that can have a part in the causes of these
provocateurs exercises, one of them to be the talks with Moscow for the
purchase of equipment for the Air Force and radar high complexity of the mobile
class "29B6-Container" although this seems rather an exaggeration,
but the apparent determination to restructure its defense area concern the
British elite.
And not really know or better to say not
understand why the Foreign Office meddle in the decisions of a foreign
government without anyone asked her opinion. What the hell cares what the
British bureaucrats who buys Argentina and who is for it? London simply
hypocrisy stinks like mass media.
When Argentina met with representatives of
the Pentagon and State Department last June, there were several offers of
Americans who shook the political hornet's nest in the House of Commons and
even a flood of reports and internal memos between senior officers of the her majesty's
Royal Navy. In particular the military were concerned that the US granted them
the ability to access F-16 jets and clunkers "Northrop F-5", that
despite his old age in the hands of the Argentine pilots can bring unpleasant
surprises.
According to some comments that came into
my ears, Pentagon commanders and some admirals rated the concerns of their
British colleagues as absurd and exaggerated inviting them not to interfere in
this new phase that began with the Argentines. Just imagine the British commanders
to bite their comments and return with heads down to the Americans,
inconveniently for foreign policy in London and a bad sign that told the
Argentine image, there are possibilities to rebuild the muscles that they had
taken from them.
argie commands in 1982 |
British anger had to go somewhere and some
ass should feel the boot of London. And they saw better opportunity to make
clear to Buenos Aires that on the "Malvinas" islands no negotiations
did not see better as puto on the face candidacy to chair the General Secretary
of United Nations Chancellor Susana Malcorra, who saw their aspirations
personal and the political aspirations of Buenos Aires scattered on the floor.
The chair member of the Security Council of Britain represented by Mathew
Rycroft veto the Argentine candidate achieving revenge on expectations that
Argentina put on achieving reach that step.
With this do you any doubt the obsequious
government Mauricio Macri that London does not care how much to crawl to lick
your feet? Undoubtedly Argentine officials continue sinning innocent and
apparently learned the lessons of the history and even less of the British,
where the courage of men with warm blood in his veins, does not work the way we
think of the perverse and cold are the continuation of British rulers as Edward
I "Longshanks".
And also beyond these evils British
policies have an important interest in the South Atlantic and that is the NATO
base of Mount Pleasant. But Did not Britain left the European Union and the
BREXIT not be more in the Atlantic Alliance? Moonshine! That means nothing to
London and when it comes to global interests the Alliance is not broken and
operates independently of what governments show to the public. The alleged
discussions between Angela Merkel and Theresa May on the redesign of the strategic
defense of the European Union are just a charade for the cameras and nothing
else. London to secure its geostrategic position in the South Atlantic not only
by a mere territorial interest, but because of the importance for world
domination objectives that are planned from Washington, London and Brussels
axis.