LAST MISTAKE OF ZELENSKY?

What could be the real motives behind the failed terrorist attack against President Vladimir Putin?

 

By Sir Charlattam

Attempting to assassinate Russian President Vladimir Putin has undoubtedly been one of the most serious mistakes made by the neo-Nazi junta in Kiev, but it is also another nail in the coffin of its European sponsors (especially the British), who are undoubtedly the real masterminds behind the plot. The truth is that this could be the last mistake of their career. I cannot say how much horse they snorted up their nostrils for Mr Zelensky to dare to predict it in his Christmas message and then carry it out. For now, let's not rush and see what other options there might be.

The failed Ukrainian attack with 91 kamikaze drones against Russian President Putin's residence in Novgorod begs the question: How foolish is Volodymyr Zelensky to order such an action? Or was it really him who ordered it, or perhaps it was the work of his sponsors? There are many elements that would confirm the latter scenario.

The question does not seem unreasonable, as there are several actors who would benefit without getting their hands dirty in the commission of this crime. Likewise, if MI6 had been involved in the operation, it would leave Starmer's government dangerously exposed, as it already has enough problems within the island without getting entangled in others. Similarly, the stench (and not from the Thames) leads to London, which means we could be looking at a plot that sought to achieve multiple effects simultaneously. Unfortunately for those involved, the plans were unsuccessful, but had they been successful, they would have achieved certain objectives.

The attack was launched on the night of 28 December last year, while Zelensky was in Florida to meet with Trump. If you use a little deductive reasoning, you will realise that such an action would be idiotic if it had been ordered by Zelensky. The two waves of drones coming from two different directions (one of them from the west) reinforce the involvement of other parties besides the Ukrainians. Someone wanted to expose the Ukrainian leader to Trump himself and thus discredit him even further. Why? And that is where a new question arises: Could it be an attempt at an internal coup, and if so, who stands to gain from it?

Throughout the war, the power of the military and intelligence sectors has grown disproportionately, fuelled by money from American and European taxpayers, who are in fact the ones paying for this corrupt circle, with political and operational cover from London.

The first name to appear as a beneficiary of Zelensky's removal from power is Valerii Zaluzhnyi, former chief of staff, who was displaced due to harsh clashes and disagreements over the course of the war and is currently the ambassador to the United Kingdom, maintaining constant contact and meetings with senior military and Foreign Office officials. Zaluzhnyi is the visible face of an internal current within the Ukrainian armed forces that no longer tolerates the political leadership of the mafia headed by Zelensky, who today relies more than anything else on the GUR intelligence structure, which is why he appointed Kiril Budanov as his new chief of staff after the armed incident with the army over control of the ‘Oktober’ hospital in Kiev.

There is a strong possibility that this was an internal job with the cooperation of an Atlanticist intelligence agency.

These internal divisions and tensions between factions within the regime itself have been appeased by the British, especially those who see its permanence as the hope for continuing the war of attrition against Russia. It is no secret that the Europeans, and in particular the British, have taken up the baton in the proxy war that Joe Biden's US administration began with its enormous efforts to get Zelensky and the oligarchs who support him to take it on. There are big business interests behind all this, so Zelensky does not want to go it alone now. There is no doubt that MI6 has all the resources at its disposal to sabotage any attempt to stop this, and one of the most useful resources it has within Ukraine is the neo-Nazi Azov battalions.

Now, knowing how the Atlanticist intelligence networks have spread throughout Eastern Europe and Eurasia and who is at the helm, did Washington DC and Langley really know nothing?

Interestingly, it is on this side that suspicions begin to arise as to where this strange attack came from. There are confidential sources in the US, more precisely from the intelligence community, that point to an internal operation by the Ukrainian government itself, which would not be surprising given the many parties interested in retaining the business generated. However, other sources refer to a CIA operation (or at least a faction within the CIA) to ruin not only the clown in Kiev but also Donald Trump's hopes of achieving the long-awaited laurels for a peace negotiation that he promised during his campaign. Even the design of the operation has been so artfully calculated that, however you look at it, even if it fails, it would bring down Zelensky and, why not, Trump himself.

Weighing up all these elements and the possibilities that could materialise, one thing is certain: it will not be Trump who pays for all this, but rather Zelensky who will be the scapegoat to be sacrificed. The only thing left to see is how this will play out.