SUPPORTING
VOLODOMYR
Why
has the leader of the Ukrainian neo-Nazi regime become a liability that is
impossible to continue supporting?
By Sidney Hey
The
course of events in Ukraine would seem to indicate that Donald Trump’s
administration has withdrawn its support from the little ‘Führer’ in Kyiv. This
can be inferred from various signs some obvious, others less so which suggest
that Washington is seeking a change of leadership in the Eurasian country. It
would appear that for American politicians, even within the globalist
worldview, supporting Volodymyr Zelensky has now become a thankless task.
And this is not because
of any dislike for his disastrous ideology, nor, far from it, because he is a
Zionist very close to his leader Netanyahu; rather, it is due to the economic
impact that ordinary citizens have had to endure as a result of the ideological
whims of each successive White House administration (particularly the Clintons
and Biden), an impact that Donald Trump has exacerbated to an unimaginable
degree.
It is, as Bill Clinton
once said in other circumstances: “It’s the economy, stupid!”. This time, it is
the American people and even the Republicans who supported Trump who are
quoting him on this. For them, the war has lost the purpose it may initially
have served (particularly for the globalist-neoconservatives), which was to
extend US influence to the very gates of the Russian Federation by using
Ukraine as a platform for NATO.
But things have not
turned out as expected and, even beyond Trump’s bluster and lies, many in
Washington and especially within the Pentagon – are still asking: ‘What is this
war all about?’ Whilst they wonder what purpose the Anchorage summit served,
many have already realised that it was merely a theatrical performance to
satisfy Trump’s ego.
To make matters worse,
the US president’s stupidity – epitomised by the 28 February attack on the
Islamic Republic of Iran, carried out solely to curry favour with his Israeli
friend Bibi Netanyahu has led to an unforeseen shortage of his strategic fuel
reserves, forcing him to call Moscow and ask (beg) Vladimir Putin to fulfil his
request for diesel.
As Ukraine has virtually
no operational refineries left, Donald Trump had no choice but to turn to
Russia, which – although it has been under constant drone attacks (directed and
funded by the West) maintains its diesel reserves at an acceptable level.
This not only infuriated
Zelensky, leading him to claim that he had been “betrayed”, but also sparked
panic amongst his aides, who are well aware that without strategic support from
the Americans, their days would be numbered. To this end, he quickly travelled
to London to seek assistance and, if possible, an increase in support, both in
terms of communications provision via Starlink and Storm Shadow missiles (of
which there are not many available).
As Elon Mosk’s network is
under the total control of the Americans and he is now on good terms with
Trump, replacing it with an alternative European system is proving to be a
conundrum. Without internet coverage, there is no way to direct drone strikes, no
way to conduct electronic intelligence operations, and certainly no way to
manage an air defence system (now that it no longer has Patriots) that is even
minimally effective against the new, faster Russian GERAN models.
There is a major clash of
interests here. Whilst Donald Trump, under pressure from an election looming in
November, needs to put the brakes on a war that no longer makes sense, the
Europeans led by the British simply want to step on the accelerator so that
hostilities escalate even further.
For either option, the
decisive factor is Zelensky himself. If Donald Trump were to get rid of the
neo-Nazi leader by whatever means best suits him, it could improve his standing
with his electorate; however, let us say that he does not have the time to do
so. On the other hand, if the British manage to protect Zelensky and keep him
in power, the arms industry’s business – fuelled by the colossal loans from the
collective West and the financial networks involving senior officials such as
Ms Ursula von der Leyen and Ms Kaja Kalas – will be able to continue.
Beyond all this
speculation and the domestic political pressures facing Trump, there is one
very important issue he cannot afford to neglect, and that is China. Despite
the symbolic agreement reached at the last summit, those in Washington who are
actually thinking clearly know that all they have achieved is to delay the
inevitable namely, China’s rise to become the dominant power in the
Indo-Pacific. If the US continues to squander its resources on futile and
extremely costly wars, such as those in Iran and Ukraine, there will be no way
to maintain a policy of containment regarding China’s aspirations over the
island of Taiwan whilst simultaneously sustaining its stranglehold on the
American continent.
