TERROR OVER KAZAN

What are the aims of Ukraine's terrorist attacks deep inside Russian territory?

 

By Sir Charlattam

In the no longer credible Western media little or nothing is reported about what is happening in Ukraine and the entire Eurasian region. In reality, this does not surprise me at all, but it takes on a whole new dimension when you experience it in person. The motivations are clear and a very obvious one we would summarise as follows: Everything is going very badly for the neo-Nazi regime subservient to Atlanticist interests. But there are also other implications that compel these news-making emporiums, and one of them is the direct involvement of NATO agents in the actions on the ground.

Between the afternoon of 23 August and the evening of 24 August, one of my friends who was travelling in Tatarstan in the interior of the Russian Federation, just as he was boarding a plane at Kazan airport, when everything seemed to be normal, suddenly sirens started blaring everywhere without understanding what was going on. He would soon realise when he heard the first boom of an explosion from a Ukrainian drone that was part of an attack on the city. 

Panic gripped the terminal and as everyone ran for cover my colleague tried to call his partner who was waiting for him in St Petersburg.

Of course my colleague ended up missing the flight and after hours of waiting he had to sleep on the cold concrete floor of the air terminal but he was certainly thankful that he was not hurt or did not board that plane that could have been hit by one of these Nazi fireballs and thus not tell the story.

KAZAN2

These were moments of terror where there were women with babies and families waiting to travel peacefully. They had become targets of neo-Nazi attacks showing the same contempt that the Zionists have for the Palestinian population, today in the genocide in Gaza. Of course of which the media like CNN, NBC, BBC, and the whole galaxy of hoax makers in the West were not going to give a single article. Once again, the clear Russophobic bias to the attack.

How was it known that they were Ukrainians? Due to the good work of Russia's air defences, several of these aircraft could be shot down and some of them, when rendered inert, exposed their class and origin beyond doubt and could not have reached the deep interior without the assistance of NATO's strategic intelligence, so the questions begin here: Are the Washington-sponsored negotiations productive or are they just a cover to buy time, and what can Moscow's response to this continuation of double talk be?

The non-negotiable condition to demilitarise Ukraine is increasingly substantiated by these terrorist attacks, which do not cease to be terrorist attacks because they are carried out with military equipment. The freedom with which they carry out these attacks on Russian soil can only be explained by the permissiveness and complicity of the Western actors behind these events. And in reality it is not because it is Kiev that has the real capabilities to carry them out, but because of the interference of their sponsors who instigate and arm them to that effect.

This is where a serious dilemma arises. Will demilitarising Ukraine stop hostile actions against the Federation? Considering the not-so-secret involvement of several regional actors, including Poland and the Baltic states, the answer seems to be no. Last week, a drone carrying an explosive device was sent to Ukraine by the Russian Federation. Last week a drone carrying explosives that set off from Estonia ended up exploding midway through its journey, revealing the direction of the attack.

Of course, we do not forget that those who are really behind these regional actors are the British, French and Germans trying to fill the gap left (allegedly) by the lack of US coverage and involvement.

So far Putin's government has limited itself to striking back against highly strategic targets in Ukraine, both in Kiev and elsewhere against arms industries, missile developments (SAPSAN program) and troop assembly and supply centres, the latter targeting ports in Odessa and the very ships that try to unload weapons arriving from Europe.

In the military area, in addition to other serious setbacks to strategic intelligence support, including the unexpected capture of several British military intelligence officers (MI6) and the elimination (so far in the war) of an unspecified number of other British and other NATO assets.

The attack on Kazan is not new, as in November and December last year it suffered several similar attacks, revealing the complicity of Atlanticist agencies in providing the material, training and strategic intelligence to enable a long-range attack inside Russia to be executed.

Although the Zelensky regime is widely supported in generating these propaganda war propaganda coups, its future is like that of a dying man in an operating theatre, whose fate is certain to be the morgue.

Equally, we should not expect this to calm down or for Zelensky and his band of Nazi flag-wavers to moderate their actions. As their front is crumbling and the fall of strategic localities like Pokrovsk is a fact that sooner or later they will not be able to avoid, the tactic of terrorism will become more and more the strategy for fighting the Russian Federation.